Divide it by 3, and if its a whole number with no .'s then it's a multiple of 3.
3x=3269283
x=1089761
3269283 is a multiple of 3
3 x 1089761 = 3269283
yes.
Yes.
Yes.
402 is not the first multiple of 3. The first multiple of any number is itself. 402 is 134 times 3.
If the sum of the digits is a multiple of three, the whole number is a multiple of three.
The least common multiple of 3 and 5 is 15. This, however is not a multiple of 2 so we must find the next common multiple of 3 and 5. This is 30. Since 30 is also a multiple of 2, 30 is therefore the least common multiple of 3, 5 and 2.
ur a dummy cuz i know
I dont know cause im a baby
No. We know that 200 is not a multiple of three, once the six has been elimated by taking 2 lots of three to start with.
If any number's digits add up to a multiple of 3, then that number is a multiple of 3. For this number, 6 + 9 + 3 = 18, and 18 is a multiple of 3 (if we didn't know that, we could see that 1 + 8 = 9, which is a multiple of 3). That means we can divide 693 by 3, and we get 231. Is 231 divisible by 3? Well, 2 + 3 + 1 = 6, so it is. Divide 231 by 3 and you get 77. That means 77 * 3 * 3 = 693.
What is a multiple of 2 and 3?A multiple of 2 and 3 is 6.