If you multiply each term of the first type of equation by a common multiple of all the denominators then you will have an equation of the second type.
For example, if you have 2/3*y = 4/5*x + 7/9 then multiplying by the LCM of 3, 5, 9) = 45, gives
30*y = 39*x + 35: all integers!
Integers are numbers with no fractional part. Rational numbers are those that can be expressed as a fraction (unlike pi or square root of 2). The number -1 is both because it has no fractional part and can be expressed as -1/1.
It is a trivial difference. If you multiply every term in the equation with rational numbers by the common multiple of all the rational numbers then you will have an equation with integers.
Yes, it does.
The discriminant must be a perfect square or a square of a rational number.
x = sqrt(2). The zeros are irrational.
No. The equation 3/2 x + 2/3 y - 7 = 42 is a linear equation. But the coefficients of x and y are both rational numbers, not whole numbers.
There are no consecutive rational numbers. Between any two rational numbers there are an infinity of rational numbers.
If there are no numbers after the 9 it is rational
No. Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. All rational numbers are real.
The set of rational numbers includes all whole numbers, so SOME rational numbers will also be whole number. But not all rational numbers are whole numbers. So, as a rule, no, rational numbers are not whole numbers.
Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction. All natural numbers are rational.
6.6 is rational. Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.