Very probably: a long time!! It depends on the speed of your counting though, and whether you're counting up in 1s or in googolplexes. -- Let's suppose you can count at the speed of light. That means that in one second you can count 186,000 digits. Even with that, it would take you approximately 10^18 years to count to googolplex. (That's 1000000000000000000 years, or One Quintillion years) Simply put, if you started counting at light speed the second the Big Bang you'd still be nowhere NEAR googolplex. And larger still is the Googolplexplex and the Graham's Number.
zero is not a counting number. if you count the number of kids in a room, would you start with the number 0?
Count the number of waves passing a point in one second. That is frequency. Or count waves for 10 seconds and divide by 10.
If a timer is counting down from 30, it doesn't actually count 30. It starts counting at 29. If you are counting up to 10, you wouldn't count the number that you are counting from. If you counted 0, you would actually be counting 11 numbers.
When you count the number of atoms in a molecule.
no because in these terms, zero doesn't count as a number :)
11 days 13 hours 46 seconds that is a lot it is also 1 week 4 and a half days and one hour , 46 seconds and that is how long it takes to count to 1 million counting one number every second day and night
To convert a number to scientific notation do as follows: 5800000 = 5.8 x 10^6 Put a decimal between the first and second number then from that second number count to the right. The number you have when you finish counting is the number that is in the power position.
When numbers count by five, the number you are counting to either has a 5 or 0 in it.
you count one dollar a second so it would probably take you about 31 and a half years.
You can count the number of neighbors you have in farmville by counting them in the ladder in the game, or by going to the "my neighbors" tab and counting.
This is because traditionally we count by whole numbers.
1 million seconds. Or, a little more than 11 days of nonstop counting
the number of hertz = count per second
If you are not counting the training level, the second is the Defense Ministry. If you count the training level, it is called Police Station.
The natural numbers are the numbers used to count things (the counting numbers). The smallest number of things you can have when you have some to count is one. Thus the smallest natural number is 1.
There are no whole numbers that are not also counting numbers. Both terms mean the same subset of numbers: positive integers greater than zero. Some people consider zero to be a whole number but not a counting number, because you can't "count" zero.
If you counted at the rate of one number per second, it would take 320 trillion years to count to 10 billion trillion. It makes no difference WHAT you're counting.
Counting at one number per second, a lot longer than the universe has been in existence. If current theories of proton decay are true, then a lot longer than the total life of the universe. Furthermore, it takes a lot longer than a second to count numbers with lots of digits.
an official second counting of election ballots, triggered by a legal challenge of the of the first count. so that means you have count all the ballots again because the first count went wrong.
There is no such number. You can always count one more. And then one more than that. And one more than THAT. And so on.
it would take a billion seconds if you're counting 1 number per second. That is 31 years, 259 days, 1 hour, 46 minutes, and 39 seconds. In other words if you want to count, you better start now!
The pour plate procedure can be used to count the number of bacteria in a sample. This is done by counting the colonies and estimating the number of bacteria total across all colonies.
Yes - the concept of a zero in the list of counting numbers was introduced in around 628AD.
The way most people count, yes.