answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Different double-decker buses can carry different numbers of passengers. If all the passengers were to be seated, you would need 13889 London red buses. Of course, a single double-decker bus, over its lifetime, will carry a million (or more) passengers.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How many double decker buses would i need to carry A million passengers?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

How long is 30 meters?

3 Duoble decker buses


Is there way of describing the quantities involved in the news without using number?

In some cases it may be possible by using comparisons, but that depends on the readers being familiar with the concepts. You could say "it fell from the height of a double-decker bus" but that statement would have no meaning to someone who had never seen a double-decker bus. And what would you do if it fell from twice that height? You could not say 2 double-decker buses because that is using a number (2).


How many 36 passengers buses would it take to carry 114 people?

You would need four buses. Three would be full and there would be six people on the last bus.


Why measurement are meaningful if standard units are not used?

They can be meaningful but usually to only a limited audience.If I described someone as being as tall as me, my friends and colleagues would have a pretty good idea. But no one else would have much of a clue.Newspapers often use non-standard units that its readers may be familiar with. For example: (UK perspective) volumes that would fill Olympic swimming pools, high as a stack of double decker buses, areas as big as Wales. I suppose an Olympic pool is a standard, but that should not detract from the point that I am trying to make.They can be meaningful but usually to only a limited audience.If I described someone as being as tall as me, my friends and colleagues would have a pretty good idea. But no one else would have much of a clue.Newspapers often use non-standard units that its readers may be familiar with. For example: (UK perspective) volumes that would fill Olympic swimming pools, high as a stack of double decker buses, areas as big as Wales. I suppose an Olympic pool is a standard, but that should not detract from the point that I am trying to make.They can be meaningful but usually to only a limited audience.If I described someone as being as tall as me, my friends and colleagues would have a pretty good idea. But no one else would have much of a clue.Newspapers often use non-standard units that its readers may be familiar with. For example: (UK perspective) volumes that would fill Olympic swimming pools, high as a stack of double decker buses, areas as big as Wales. I suppose an Olympic pool is a standard, but that should not detract from the point that I am trying to make.They can be meaningful but usually to only a limited audience.If I described someone as being as tall as me, my friends and colleagues would have a pretty good idea. But no one else would have much of a clue.Newspapers often use non-standard units that its readers may be familiar with. For example: (UK perspective) volumes that would fill Olympic swimming pools, high as a stack of double decker buses, areas as big as Wales. I suppose an Olympic pool is a standard, but that should not detract from the point that I am trying to make.


How many out of 210 buses would be late if the probability that a bus arrives on time is 4 sevenths?

If the probability that a bus arrives on time 4 sevenths of a time, it means that for every 7 buses, 4 arrive on time. By deduction it also means that for every 7 buses 3 of them come late. If out of 7 buses 3 come late can you figure out how many buses out of 210 buses will be late based on the same probability? I am sure you can. Good luck!