answersLogoWhite

0

Quite simply, you don't convert from square meters to linear meters. Those units are not compatible.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How many lineal meters in 25 square meters when laying floor boards?

Lineal metres = Square metres/Width of the boards.


How many lineal meters of carpet to cover 1500 square feet?

Lineal metres = Square metre/Width of the carpet.


How many square meters in 228 lineal meters?

The units cannot be exchanged or converted


How many square meters to 750 lineal meters?

To determine the square meters in 750 lineal meters, we need the width of the area. If you provide the width in meters, we can calculate the square meters by multiplying the width by the length (750 meters).


Ive got a 7800X3200 deck how many lineal meters of decking will you require?

Lineal metres = Square metres/Width of the boards.


How many lineal feet is 156 lineal meters squared?

156 meters squared = 24,336 meters.


How many sq feet will 29 lineal meters carpet cover?

29 lineal carpet metres should cover 104 square metres


How many lineal feet is 45 lineal meters?

147.63


How many lineal meters in 100 square meters?

None. A lineal metre is a measure of distance while a square metre is a measure of area. The two measure different things and it makes no sense to try to convert from one to the other.


How many lineal meters will cover 30 square meters?

As a linear meter is a length with zero width, even with an infinite number of them they will not cover an area of 30 square meters.


How many meters is 16.9 lineal meters?

A lineal metre or linear metre is the same as ametre. So the answer is 16.9 metres.


How many lineal meters are 250 square meters x 2.50 meters high?

None, since there can be no conversion. A lineal or linear metre is a measure of length in 1-dimensional space while 250 square metres x 2.50 metres is a measure of volume in 3-dimensional space. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at conversion from one to the other is fundamentally flawed.