There is no equivalence.
A kilogram is a measure of mass. A yard is a measure of length. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid.
If you knew the density of the soil, you could convert the mass to volume. But even that is not enough. You would still need to know the depth of cover required.
NONE.Yards measure distance and kilograms measure weight.
soil weighs 1600 kg/ cubic meter
It depends on what kind of rock it is.
None. A square foot is a measure of area and so has no volume. Since there is no volume, there can be no mass.
Density of loose soil is about 1200 kg/m3 1 cubic meter of soil may weigh more than this if compacted or moist.
One Kg is not equivalent of ANY yards. -Kg is weight - yards is length. Are you aware of those different concepts.
NONE.Yards measure distance and kilograms measure weight.
soil weighs 1600 kg/ cubic meter
a cubic meter of soil will weight 550-900 kg depending on its composition
This one Akadama soil composition defined. Akadama soil: Al203 0.334 kg kg−1, SiO2 0.470 kg kg−1, Fe203 0.157 kg kg−1 by weight. See link: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2006.032_6.x/abstract
6-9Mg of soil in one ha (assuming 1m depth). This variation/range is based on the bulk density; hence, the soil type.
4
750 kg of garden soil at $5.00 per ton = $4.13
A yard is a unit of distance. A kilogram is a unit of mass. The two units are therefore incompatible.
I'm afraid that makes no sense. A kilogram (kg) is a unit of mass. A yard is a unit of measurement.
You do not convert from kilograms (kg) to yards (yds). KG is a measure of weight. YDS is a measure of distance. There is no direct relationship between the two.
It depends on what kind of rock it is.