their chances are better because its a car crash
who more likelly to die bike or car crash
Ice is slippery, right?
50/50 really if you think about it depends on the driver.
plane crash only because even a small electronic malfunction can cause a plane to crash a bride is just steel and iron not much can go wrong there
They were much more likely than adults to be injured.
The gameplay is much more detailed, free-roaming and adventurous, and overall Twinsanity is much more fun better.
A car crash is much more probable than a plane crash if you take into consideration how many people will travel by car per day compared to the number who will travel by air; take into consideration how many cars with how many drivers are likely to make a mistake compared to the number of planes and flight crews.
Sonic is much more famous and has better games.
It probably got caught in Jupiter's strong gravitational pull much stronger than earths which was unexpected by bright scientists like Galileo... And also, to clarify your question.. there is no land on Jupiter so the spacecraft technically did not crash and it was more likely crushed and melted.
It falls in line with being aware of your surroundings and driving defensively, which all motorists are responsible for, regardless of what they're driving. Emphasis is placed on motorcyclists not for the purpose of applying a different standard, but because they impose a particular risk, both for the motorcyclists and other motorists. They're much smaller than other vehicles on the road, and thus, are not as visible, particularly at night or in times of inclement weather. Thus, motorists need to be particularly aware of motorcyclists for this reason.
Only about 0.000001% of planes ever crash. Generally, the drive down to the airport is much more dangerous than flying a plane.
about 70%