answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

65 mph = 95.333 ft/s, thus to cover 672 ft would take

672/95.333 = 7.05 seconds

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How much time does it take to cover 672 feet at 65 mph?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How much area does one Rose of Sharon plant cover?

Once mature, a Rose of Sharon plant will cover an area of approximately 15 feet by 9 feet. It will take a long time to reach this size, and will only be half that at ten years of age, assuming suitable growing conditions.


How much time will it take to fall 150 feet?

Enough time for you to regret jumping.


If a tree grows1.2 feet each year how much time has passed if it has grown feet?

It will take a tree a very long time to grow feet.


How much time would it take to travel 192 feet at 20 mph?

It would take 6.55 seconds.


How much time does it take to cover fifty miles by car?

It depends on how fast you are travelling. If you are travelling at 50mph - it would take an hour to cover 50 miles. If you travelled at 25mph, it would take 2 hours And so on...


How much time do it take you to walk ten feet?

If you walk at a rate of 6 mph, it takes 1.136 seconds to walk 10 feet.


How much time driving 100 feet at 25 mph?

It would take 2.73 seconds to drive 100 feet at 25 mph


How much time will it take to cover a distance of 1500km by a train if the avreage speed is 50 km?

3 hours


How do I solve 'the mean speed in feet per seconds' if I can cover 90 feet in 4.5 seconds?

"Mean" means "average"= (distance covered) divided by (time to cover the distance)= ( 90 / 4.5 ) = 20 feet per second


How much time does it take to fly from Vancouver directly to Chicago?

the time is how much time i take to take a shower


If driving 40 mph how much time would it take to cover 17 miles?

25 minutes 30 seconds. This is the actual driving time at that speed and does not include stops or delays.


Why do angels cover there feet?

They either do not have feet or they had very long cloth because they didn't need feet fo anything. They don't need to walk. Maybe at the time, it was a bad thing to show your feet.