6.3
A positive integer is a whole number or a counting number that is greater than 0. "Decimal" simply means that the place value of each digit is ten time that of the digit to its right. A decimal number does not require a decimal point.
It is 9 times greater.
454 is, itself a decimal number. A decimal number is simply a way of representing a number in such a way that the place value of each digit is ten times that of the digit to its right. A decimal representation does not require a decimal point.
The thousands place is the digit 4 left of the decimal point; in a whole number the decimal point is "hiding" after the ones digit. In 26195 the thousands digit is 6.
A decimal number is simply a way of representing a number in such a way that the place value of each digit is ten times that of the digit to its right. If it does not contain a fractional part then the decimal representation does not require a decimal point.
Yes, unless the 3 digit number is negative, or a decimal.
No. A decimal number is simply a way of representing a number in such a way that the place value of each digit is ten times that of the digit to its right. A decimal representation does not require a decimal point. It can be greater than, equal to or less than 1.
No, 3.617 is not greater than 3.70. In decimal notation, the first digit after the decimal point represents tenths, the second digit represents hundredths, and so on. So, in this case, 3.617 is less than 3.70 because it's closer to 3.6 while 3.70 is closer to 3.7.
A positive integer is a whole number or a counting number that is greater than 0. "Decimal" simply means that the place value of each digit is ten time that of the digit to its right. A decimal number does not require a decimal point.
Just compare the first decimal digit. The number that has the larger digit here, is the larger number.
138.17 the hundredths place is second number after the decimal. Look at 3rd number after decimal and if 5 or greater round up the hundredths number to next greater digit; if less than 5 round down a digit.
Since the integer part is the same (zero vs. zero), compare the FIRST decimal digit. The number with the larger decimal digit is the larger number.
yes The way to know is by comparing the numbers' most significant digits, which are the nonzero digits that are farthest to the left with respect to the decimal point. A number is greater if its most significant digit is farther left from the decimal point or closer to the right side of the decimal point. For example, 123.1 is greater than 45.99 because 123.1 has its most significant digit in the hundreds place, the 3rd place left of the decimal point, while the most significant digit of 45.99 is in the tens place. Also, 0.01 is greater than 0.00499 because the most significant digit of 0.01 is closer to the right side of the decimal point (in the hundredths place). In cases like these where the two numbers have their most significant digits in different places, the values of the digits don't matter; the one with the most significant digit farther to the left is always greater. In cases like the posted question, where the most significant digits are in the same place (in this case, the tenths place), the number whose most significant digit has the greater value is the greater number. It doesn't matter how many other digits are to the right of the most significant digit. For example, 0.23 is greater than 0.198574659, because 2 is greater than 1.
the last # and the decimal point
Exactly as in the question.A decimal is a way of representing a number in such a way that the place value of each digit is ten times that of the digit to its right. A decimal representation does not require a decimal point. Zeros after the decimal point are inappropriate because they imply a greater degree of precision and there is no justification for that.Exactly as in the question.A decimal is a way of representing a number in such a way that the place value of each digit is ten times that of the digit to its right. A decimal representation does not require a decimal point. Zeros after the decimal point are inappropriate because they imply a greater degree of precision and there is no justification for that.Exactly as in the question.A decimal is a way of representing a number in such a way that the place value of each digit is ten times that of the digit to its right. A decimal representation does not require a decimal point. Zeros after the decimal point are inappropriate because they imply a greater degree of precision and there is no justification for that.Exactly as in the question.A decimal is a way of representing a number in such a way that the place value of each digit is ten times that of the digit to its right. A decimal representation does not require a decimal point. Zeros after the decimal point are inappropriate because they imply a greater degree of precision and there is no justification for that.
50 cents, exactly as in the question. A decimal is a way of representing a number in such a way that the place value of each digit is ten times that of the digit to its right. A decimal representation does not require a decimal point. Zeros after the decimal point are inappropriate because they imply a greater degree of precision and there is no justification for that.
Since the whole parts are equal, take a look at the FIRST DECIMAL DIGIT - the first digit after the decimal point. The larger number is the one that has the larger digit in this position.