answersLogoWhite

0

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: If a woman walks in a store and steals $100 out of the register and comes back in 5 minutes later and buys $70 worth of groceries and gets $30 in change how much did the owner lose?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

What is a good real world example of why revenge is bad?

A guy steals your animal cracker, and you try to set fire to his lunch, and you end up in trouble


How much does a cubic metre of gas cost?

That depends entirely what country you're in - Every country steals a different amount from the price through tax !


How much did the owner lose if a woman walks into a store and steals 100 out of the register and comes back 5 minutes later and buys 70 worth of groceries and gets 30 in change?

Scenario 1: The woman paid with the $100 she stoleIf the woman paid with the $100 she stole, the owner lost $100. The woman bought $70 of groceries with his money and then received $30 in change. Work the question out step by step:First, the woman takes $100 dollars from the register.The owner has currently lost $100.Second, the woman buys $70 worth of groceries. But it's not her money she's going to pay with, so it's another $70 stolen.The owner has currently lost $170.The lady pays the teller $100. That's stolen, so she is giving the $100 back to the owner.The owner has currently lost $70.Finally, the woman receives $30 back in change. She paid with the owner's money, so the owner is giving her $30.The owner lost $100.Scenario 2: The woman returned with her own $100However, if the woman brought in her own $100, the owner would have still lost $100 because she stole $100 and paid with her own money. Work it out:First, the woman steals $100 from the register.The owner has lost $100.Second, the woman comes back and is going to buy $70 of groceries with her own $100. She has not yet paid for it.The owner has lost $170.The lady pays the teller $100. This is her own money, so the teller gains $100.The owner has lost $70.Finally, the woman receives $30 back in change.The owner has lost $100.Scenario 3: The woman returns with a counterfeit $100A third scenario would be that the woman returned with a counterfeit $100. If that is the case, then the owner lost $200.First, $100 were stolen from the register.Second, $70 were bought with fake moneyThird, $30 were given in exchange for fake money---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This is an interesting question and could depend on how you define "lost". Personally I would define the loss to the vendor as the amount required to give redress, ie put them back in the situation before the theft. Working through the transactions (assuming legal tender at all times) gives:Theft for $100 - vendor has lost $100Thief pays $100 to vendor - vendor has lost $0Vendor gives $30 change - vendor has lost $30Vendor lets thief take away goods with a sales price including sales tax of $70 - vendor has lost the cost price of the goods and must pay the sales tax to the government.Thus the actual loss is $30 + cost of goods taken + sales tax on the sales price of those goods - this is the amount that the vendor would need to receive to put them back to the situation before the theft from the till took place.There is also an opportunity cost which is the potential profit that the vendor would have made on the sale of those goods: loss + potential profit = $100.Another way to see what has happened:It is often easier to look at a problem if it is either reduced to the minimum or expanded ridiculously. In this case, if we reduce the problem to the minimum, then we consider the vendor making only this sale (having for some unknown reason left lots of money in the till).After this transaction we know:cost of goodssales price of goods (assume greater than cost as normally goods are sold for a profit)sales tax on goods: some percentage of sales price which is money that has to be paid to the government; total paid to vendor is sales price = sales taxmoney received (less change): $100 - $30 = $70money stolen: $100The profit(/loss) on the sale is: sales_price - cost_pricemoney paid to government: sales_taxAfter the theft is discovered: final profit = sales_price - cost_price - $100A loss is a negative profit, so the loss is -(sales_price - cost_price - $100) = $100 + cost_price - sales_riceThe money received is sales price + sales tax, thus:sales_price + sales_tax = $70→ sales_price = $70 - sales_taxSubstituting this for sales price in the final loss gives:→loss = $100 + cost_price - sales_price= $100 + cost_price - ($70 - sales_tax)= $100 + cost_price - $70 + sales_tax= $30 + cost of goods + sales taxas the next amount of money the vendor has had to pay out for this transaction - in other words the loss of this transaction to the vendor.


Where did the phrase the apple doesn't fall far from the tree originate?

This originated exactly where it sounds like it did. The first people who noticed this truth were farmers with apple trees! Nowadays, we use this as an idiom which means that the children are going to be like their parents. If someone in your neighborhood is a bad person who steals, and you catch his son one day trying to steal something, you would say"The apple does not fall far from the tree."


What type of bonds do you use roman numerals when naming?

Roman numerals are commonly used in transition metals since they can have many possible ionization states. For example: Iron(III)Chloride would be FeCl3. Since iron is giving up 3 electrons, there must be three Chlorides since each chloride takes one electron each. Metal-Nonmetal bonds are always ionic (one element steals electrons from another).

Related questions

What happens when someone steals your Hotmail account?

If someone steals your hotmail account and didnt change your password yet all you have to do is change it but if they did change the password you can only click forgot password and that's what you do when that's happenes.


What are the release dates for 60 Minutes - 1968 The I-R-S- Welfare a La Carte Steals and Lies 30-1?

60 Minutes - 1968 The I-R-S- Welfare a La Carte Steals and Lies 30-1 was released on: USA: 21 September 1997


What do you do when someone steals your username on Minecraft multipleyer?

report them to an official of minecraft and change your password


He who steals my purse steals trash but he who steals my name steals a worthless treasure?

Shakespeare's Othello but it is Misquoted.


How do you change she steals a base. into an imperative sentence?

Imperative sentences are used for issuing commands or orders."She steals a base" is a declarative sentence--it simply states a fact. The following is an example of an imperative sentence:Steal a base!


A person who steals?

A person who steals is a thief.


Who steals things?

Thieves steal things to take them without permission and to benefit themselves. This behavior is illegal and can result in consequences such as fines or jail time.


What is one who steals?

The one that steals could be a robber, theif, or a badguy.


What black and white bird steals steals bright objects?

The magpie.


What is a pecuniary thief?

A pecuniary thief is a person who steals money, as opposed to one who steals property or, today, identities. someone who steals money.


What is Jackie robinsons record for steals in one year?

37 steals in 1947


What does SPG stand for in basketball?

Steals Per Game