0
What else can I help you with?
What is used to explain a statement in a geometric proof?
Postulate, Corollary, Definition, & Theorem
Which of the following can be used to explain a statement in a geometric proof Check all that apply?
Corollary.Theorem.Definition.Postulate.
Which of the following can be used to explain the statement in a geometric proof Check all that apply. (Apex)?
Corollary.Theorem.Definition.Postulate.
What types of statement can be used to explain the steps of a proof?
The corollaries types of statement is what is used to explain the steps of a proof.
What types of the statement can be used to explain the steps of a proof?
The corollaries types of statement is what is used to explain the steps of a proof.
Can algebraic property be used to justify a statement in a geometric proof?
yes
What can explain a statement in geometric proof?
A statement in a geometric proof can be explained using definitions, postulates, theorems, and previously established statements. Definitions clarify the meaning of geometric terms, postulates serve as accepted truths without proof, and theorems are proven statements that can be used to support new claims. Additionally, logical reasoning and diagrams can help illustrate and validate the relationships between different geometric elements. Together, these components create a coherent argument that leads to a conclusion.
What is used to support steps of a geometric proof?
Steps in a geometric proof do not require support
Which of the following can be used to explain a statement in a geometic proof?
Well the scientific proof provides that we americans can be awesome. Thank you. xD
Which types of statements can justify the steps of proof?
Theorems, definitions, corollaries, and postulates
Can corollary be used in a geometric proof?
Yes.
What type of statement cannot be used to explain the steps of a proof?
A statement that is subjective, ambiguous, or based on opinion cannot be used to explain the steps of a proof. In a mathematical proof, each step must be based on objective facts, definitions, axioms, or previously proven theorems in order to ensure the validity and rigor of the argument. Statements that rely on personal beliefs, feelings, or interpretations are not suitable for constructing a logical proof.
