No 13 is not divisible by 3 because there would be a remainder of 1 and a number that is divisible by another should have no remainder
Wiki User
∙ 2015-04-20 02:25:142+3+2+6=13 which is not divisible by 3 thus 2326 is not divisible by 3
There's a trick you can use: A number is divisible by 3 if and only if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3. Here 2+4+5+2 = 13. Is 13 divisible by 3? You decide.
The divisibility rule for 3 is as follows: If the sum of the digits of a number is divisible by 3 then the number is divisible by 3. For example, the number 21 is divisible by 3 since 2+1=3, and 3 is divisible by 3. The number 49 is not divisible by 3 since 4+9=13, and 13 is not divisible by 3.
No. Consider 13 or 23.
no, it is divisible by 1, 5, 13, 65
No, it is divisible by 1, 3, 13, 39.
Yes; if 39 is divided by 3, you get 13. Another way to check this is add 13+ 13+ 13, and you will get 39.
117 / 3 = 39 39 / 3 = 13 Giving us prime factors of 3, 3 and 13. Meaning it's divisible by: 3 3 * 3 = 9 3 * 13 = 39 13 So 117 is divisible by 3, 9, 13, and 39
No Just above it is 300, and as it is 13 more than 287 and 13 itself is not divisible by 3, then 287 is also not. Or 285 = 95 x 3 and 288 = 96 x 3 so 287 is not divisible by 3
975
1170 is.
3, 9, 13, and 39.