No. That is because 1 is not a Prime number. The prime factorisation of 96 is 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 3.
3 is the greatest prime factor of 96.
32 is a factor of 96, but neither 32 nor 96 is prime.
The highest prime factor of 96 is 3.
Use a factor tree. 96 48,2 24,2,2 12,2,2,2 6,2,2,2,2 3,2,2,2,2,2 The greatest prime factor of 96 is 3.
2
No, 57 and 96 are not relatively prime because they share a common factor of 3.
96 = 24 × 4=6x4x4=2x3x2x2x2x2
As a product of its prime factors: 2*2*2*2*2*3 = 96
96 48,2 24,2,2 12,2,2,2 6,2,2,2,2 3,2,2,2,2,2
The only common prime factor is 2.
The only common prime factor is 2.
The greatest common factor of 50 and 96 is 2.Method 1: Listing FactorsList all the factors of both numbers and the highest factor that is the same is the greatest common factor.Factors of 50: 1, 2, 5, 10, 25Factors of 96: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48The greatest common factor of 50 and 96 is 2.Method 2: Prime FactorizationFind the prime factorization of each number. The prime numbers that the numbers all share multiply to the great common factor.50: 2*5*596: 2*2*2*2*2*2*350 and 96 share one 2 as a prime factor. Therefore, the greatest common factor is 2.