No. That is because 1 is not a Prime number. The prime factorisation of 96 is 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 3.
3 is the greatest prime factor of 96.
32 is a factor of 96, but neither 32 nor 96 is prime.
The highest prime factor of 96 is 3.
Use a factor tree. 96 48,2 24,2,2 12,2,2,2 6,2,2,2,2 3,2,2,2,2,2 The greatest prime factor of 96 is 3.
2
No, 57 and 96 are not relatively prime because they share a common factor of 3.
96 = 24 × 4=6x4x4=2x3x2x2x2x2
As a product of its prime factors: 2*2*2*2*2*3 = 96
Two numbers are relatively prime if their greatest common divisor (GCD) is 1. The GCD of 57 and 96 is 3, as both numbers share the factor 3 (57 = 3 × 19 and 96 = 3 × 32). Therefore, 57 and 96 are not relatively prime.
96 48,2 24,2,2 12,2,2,2 6,2,2,2,2 3,2,2,2,2,2
The only common prime factor is 2.
The only common prime factor is 2.