0

# Is 57 and 96 relatively prime?

Updated: 10/24/2023

Wiki User

β 8y ago

No, they are not relatively prime.

Wiki User

β 8y ago

β 10mo ago

No, 57 and 96 are not relatively prime because they share a common factor of 3.

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is 57 and 96 relatively prime?
Submit
Still have questions?
Related questions

### Are 96 and 105 relatively prime numbers?

No, they are not relatively prime.

No.

### Is 96 and 105 relative prime?

Yes, 96 and 105 are relatively prime because they have no prime factors in common.

Yes.

### Are 57 and 111 prime?

No. Both 57 and 111 are composite numbers. Factors of 57 are 1, 3, 19 and 57. Factors of 111 are 1, 3, 37 and 111. They share two factors 1 and 3, so they are not relatively prime either.

57 + 96 = 153

0.5938

### What is the largest prime number 57?

No, there is no largest prime number. Also 57 is not a prime.No, there is no largest prime number. Also 57 is not a prime.No, there is no largest prime number. Also 57 is not a prime.No, there is no largest prime number. Also 57 is not a prime.

### What you 57 over 100 in simplest form?

57 an 100 are relatively co-prime, i.e. they share no factors other than 1 between them, so 57 over 100 is already in simplest form.

### Are 27 and 117 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.

### Is 34 relatively prime?

It can be. 34 is relatively prime to 35. 34 is not relatively prime to 40.

### Is 25 a relatively prime?

25 is relatively prime with 36. 25 is not relatively prime with 35.