answersLogoWhite

0

No, they are not relatively prime.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
JordanJordan
Looking for a career mentor? I've seen my fair share of shake-ups.
Chat with Jordan
More answers

No, 57 and 96 are not relatively prime because they share a common factor of 3.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is 57 and 96 relatively prime?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp