No it's not. To be divisible by five it has to end in either five or zero.
No - 387/6 =64.5
No.
To determine if 387,380 is divisible by 9, you can sum its digits: 3 + 8 + 7 + 3 + 8 + 0 = 29. Since 29 is not divisible by 9, 387,380 is not divisible by 9.
No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.
35 is divisible by 5 because any number that ends in 5 is divisible by 5.
387 is divisible by: 1 3 9 43 129 and 387.
No - 387/6 =64.5
No.
62 of them.
Yes. The sum of the digits is 18 which is divisible by 3.
5 × 387 = 1935
Oh, dude, 9675 is divisible by 1, 3, 5, 15, 25, 75, 129, 387, 645, and 1935. So, like, it's got quite a few options for division parties. Just pick your favorite divisor and have at it!
To determine if 387,380 is divisible by 9, you can sum its digits: 3 + 8 + 7 + 3 + 8 + 0 = 29. Since 29 is not divisible by 9, 387,380 is not divisible by 9.
No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.
35 is divisible by 5 because any number that ends in 5 is divisible by 5.
Yes, 1255 is divisible by 5, and any number that ends in 5 is divisible by 5.
YES. 285 is divisible by 5. A number is divisible by 5 if it ends with 0 or 5