No.
No - 387/6 =64.5
No it's not. To be divisible by five it has to end in either five or zero.
To determine if 387,380 is divisible by 9, you can sum its digits: 3 + 8 + 7 + 3 + 8 + 0 = 29. Since 29 is not divisible by 9, 387,380 is not divisible by 9.
How to write 43million,297thousand,621
It is not divisible by 10. The remainder is 8.
387 is divisible by: 1 3 9 43 129 and 387.
No - 387/6 =64.5
Yes. The sum of the digits is 18 which is divisible by 3.
No it's not. To be divisible by five it has to end in either five or zero.
62 of them.
To determine if 387,380 is divisible by 9, you can sum its digits: 3 + 8 + 7 + 3 + 8 + 0 = 29. Since 29 is not divisible by 9, 387,380 is not divisible by 9.
How to write 43million,297thousand,621
387 cm * 10 mm/cm = 3870 mm
80 is not divisible by 234569 but is divisible by 10.
It's false because we have numbers that is divisible by 10 but not divisible by 5 and vice versa, we have numbers that is divisible by 10 but not divisible by 5.
No, 204 is not divisible by 10. A number is only divisible by 10 if it ends in a 0.
No, 8648246286104 is not divisible by 10, but 8648246286104 is divisible by 2 and 8