Integers are whole numbers, with no fraction or decimal part. Rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed in the form a/b where a and b are both integers. Thus 1/2 is a rational number, but not an integer. 0.34343434... is a rational number (as it can be expressed as 34/99) but is not an integer.
No, a whole number would not have a decimal point
Integers (whole numbers) are RATIONAL. Why? Well, a real number a is irrational if and only it cannot be written in lowest reducible form p/q in which p is an integer( - 10000, - 5, 0,1, 32, 34, etc.), and q is a natural number(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc.) and they share no common factor besides 1, that's is there is no number b that is not 1 such that both p and q divides b. 34 is an integer, and we know for any number a a = 1 x a and 1 = 1 / 1 so a = 1 x a a = 1 / 1 x a a = a / 1 So 34 = 34 / 1. Now, we have an integer (34) as p, and a natural number (1) as q. Now you know if it's a rational number or not?
34 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 34/1. There is no sensible way to express it as a mixed number.
Yes, 34 is a real and rational number
-34 is a rational number
Yes. -34 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction, which is -34/1.
No, 34 is not a square number because it cannot be expressed as the product of an integer multiplied by itself. In other words, there is no whole number that can be squared to equal 34. Square numbers are typically of the form n^2, where n is a whole number, such as 1, 4, 9, 16, etc.
Yes. Any rational number divided by any other rational number is a rational number.
No, every WHOLE number you can possible think of is an integer. For example: -2,253 and 2,253 are integers, but something like 1.5 or 1 1/2 are not integers because they are fractions/decimals and not whole numbers.
34/99
No.