Integers (whole numbers) are RATIONAL.
Why?
Well,
a real number a is irrational if and only it cannot be written in lowest reducible form p/q in which p is an integer( - 10000, - 5, 0,1, 32, 34, etc.), and q is a natural number(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc.) and they share no common factor besides 1, that's is
there is no number b that is not 1 such that both p and q divides b.
34 is an integer, and we know for any number a
a = 1 x a and 1 = 1 / 1
so
a = 1 x a
a = 1 / 1 x a
a = a / 1
So 34 = 34 / 1.
Now, we have an integer (34) as p, and a natural number (1) as q.
Now you know if it's a rational number or not?
-34 is a rational number
No because it is an irrational number
Yes as for example the square root of 34 is irrational
tan(34 degrees) is an irrational number and so cannot be expressed in fractional form.
The square root of 34 is irrational. This is because 34 is not a perfect square, meaning it cannot be expressed as the ratio of two integers. The decimal expansion of the square root of 34 is non-repeating and non-terminating, which is characteristic of irrational numbers.
Irrational Number
-34 is a rational number
Irrational number is a number that cannot be expressed as a fraction of two integers. Every single number you provided can be expressed as rational: 0.5 = 1/2 13 = 13/1 34 = 34/1 0.6 = 3/5 None of them is irrational.
No because it is an irrational number
Yes as for example the square root of 34 is irrational
tan(34 degrees) is an irrational number and so cannot be expressed in fractional form.
An irrational number.
No. The sum of an irrational number and any other [real] number is irrational.
The sum of a rational and irrational number must be an irrational number.
No, 3.56 is not an irrational number. 3.56 is rational.
rational * irrational = irrational.
-Pi is irrational, because it does not terminate or repeat. Whenever you multiply an irrational number by a rational number (-1), the result is an irrational number.