Study guides

Q: Is 863 divisible by 3

Write your answer...

Submit

Related questions

863 is a prime number because it is divisible by only itself & 1.

well it depends on the number you want to divide it by...... I'm not sure

3% of 863 is 25.89

It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.

All numbers divisible by 3 are NOT divisible by 9. As an example, 6, which is divisible by 3, is not divisible by 9. However, all numbers divisible by 9 are also divisible by 3 because 9 is divisible by 3.

No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.

If x is an integer divisible by 3, is x squared divisible by 3?

4/5 of 975 is bigger than 2/3 of 863

Converse:If a number is divisible by 3, then every number of a digit is divisible by three. Inverse: If every digit of a number is not divisible by 3 then the number is not divisible by 3? Contrapositive:If a number is not divisible by 3, then every number of a digit is not divisible by three.

No, it is not evenly divisible by 3. The answer you get is 6,665.3333. A trick to tell is a number is divisible by 3 is to add up the digits and see if they are divisible by 3. In this case, 34 is not divisible by 3.

1x6,743 not divisible by 2 no its not divisible by 3????

To determine if a number is divisible by 3, add all the digits. If the sum is divisible by 3, so is the number. 8+4+3+5 = 20, which is not divisible by 3 (not a multiple of 3). So, 8435 is not divisible by 3.

Add up the digits of the number. If the sum is divisible by 3, then the number itself is divisible by 3. Ex: Is 781 divisible by 3? 7+8+1=16 16 is not divisible by 3 so neither is 781 Is 903 divisible by 3? 9+0+3= 12 12 is divisible by 3 so 903 is divisible by 3

Because 9 is divisible by 3, this is like the rule where if a number is divisible by 2 and 3 it is also divisible by 6.

If this is a T-F question, the answer is false. It is true that if a number is divisible by 6, it also divisible by 3. This is true because 6 is divisible by 3. However, the converse -- If a number is divisible by 3, it is divisible by 6, is false. A counterexample is 15. 15 is divisible by 3, but not by 6. It becomes clearer if you split the question into its two parts. A number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by 3? False. It must also be divisible by 2. A number is divisible by 6 only if it is divisible by 3? True.

Not evenly. A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.

3 is not divisible by 72. 72 is divisible by 3.

3 is not divisible by 630. 630 is divisible by 3.

Is 5225 divisible by 3? A number is divisible by 3, if the sum of its digits is evenly divisible by 3. 5 + 2 + 2 + 5 = 14. Since 14 is not divisible by 3, neither is 5225.

No, look at 5 it is odd and not divisible by 3. false,because if you look at the 5 it is not divisible by 3.

no 7 is not divisible by 3 wish it was

There is no such number. Since 6 is divisible by 3, then any number that is divisible by 6 automatically has to be divisible by 3.

A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3. The sum of the digits of 60 is 6 + 0 = 6, which is divisible by 3, so, yes, 60 is divisible by 3. 60 ÷ 3 = 20

If sum of digits of a number is divisible by 3 then the number is divisible by 3. Sum of digits = 1+3+4+5+6 = 19 and 19 is not divisible by 3. So 13456 is not divisible by 3.

Yes, it is divisible by 2 because it ends with 2, it is also divisible bye 3 because 1+3+2=6. 6 is divisible by 3, therefor 132 is divisible by 3.