It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.
A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
1x6,743 not divisible by 2 no its not divisible by 3????
If this is a T-F question, the answer is false. It is true that if a number is divisible by 6, it also divisible by 3. This is true because 6 is divisible by 3. However, the converse -- If a number is divisible by 3, it is divisible by 6, is false. A counterexample is 15. 15 is divisible by 3, but not by 6. It becomes clearer if you split the question into its two parts. A number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by 3? False. It must also be divisible by 2. A number is divisible by 6 only if it is divisible by 3? True.
123 is not divisible by 2 it is divisible by 3
863 is a prime number because it is divisible by only itself & 1.
well it depends on the number you want to divide it by...... I'm not sure
3% of 863 is 25.89
No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.No, it is divisible by 3.
It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.It is divisible by 3, for example.
three24/3 = 863/3 = 21
4/5 of 975 is bigger than 2/3 of 863
A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.
Yes, if x is an integer divisible by 3, then x^2 is also divisible by 3. This is because for any integer x, x^2 will also be divisible by 3 if x is divisible by 3. This can be proven using the property that the square of any integer divisible by 3 will also be divisible by 3.
NO. 313 is not divisible by 3.A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3.313 = 3 + 1 + 3 = 7Note: 7 not divisible by 3 thus, 313 is not divisible by 3.
3 is not divisible by 126. 126 is divisible by 3.
1x6,743 not divisible by 2 no its not divisible by 3????