Study guides

Q: Is The set of good teachers is well defined set?

Write your answer...

Submit

Related questions

its not well defined because not all the students/people like the teachers,so it is not well defined

its not well defined because not all the students/people like the teachers,so it is not well defined

Elements that have to be defined by personal judgement. Such as the set ofgreat songs is not well-defined. But the set of the English alphabet is well-defined.

well defined

If there exists even one single item for which you cannot say whether it is in the set or not, the set is not well defined.

Yes, the set of happy people is not well defined.

It is a set that is well defined.

A well defined set is one that you know exactly what is meant when you read it. For example, the set of all people 6' 1" tall is well defined. Whenever you meet someone, if they're 6'1" tall, they're in the set. Otherwise, they're not. You know exactly what I mean. So that set is well defined. The set of all cute shoes is not well defined. Jane just adores buckles, so any shoe with a buckle is cute to her. But Martha likes plain shoes. Buckles are big, ugly things that detract from the shoe. So a shoe with a buckle is not cute to Martha. So the set of all cute shoes is not well defined, because you can't just look at it and determine if it belongs in the set. So the set of all buckled shoes would be well defined, but the set of all cute shoes is not.

The description of a well defined set clealy states what is in the set. For example, "deciduous trees" is a set that only includes trees that are deciduous. No conifers or non-deciduous trees are in the set. "Tall trees" is not well defined because the members of the set depends on what "tall" means to different people. Well-defined sets can be illustrated by using pictures of what would be inside and outside a circle to show which would and would not be in the set.

The set is well defined. Whether or not a given integer belongs to the set of prime numbers is clearly defined even if, for extremely large numbers, it may prove impossible to determine the status of that number.

A set is a well defined collection of elements

a set is a collection of well defined objects

Prime numbers have only 2 factors and their set is not well defined because they do not follow an orderly mathematical pattern.

Any well-defined set of numbers.

Yes. Even numbers greater than 100 is a well defined set. (Although it is a set with an infinite number of members)

yes

The set is well defined. Whether or not a given integer belongs to the set of prime numbers is clearly defined even if, for extremely large numbers, it may prove impossible to determine the status of that number.

The factors of 24 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24. If the set contains all of these factors, then the set is well defined because all elements are factors of 24, the common property of each element. 24 can be evenly divided by each number in the set and that is why it is well defined.

A set is a well defined collection of elements. By well defined, we mean that an element is either in a set or not in a set, but not both. This definitions necessarily seems rather vague, as the notion of a set is taken as an undefined primitive in axiomatic set theory; everything has a beginning, including mathematics.

yes

no

One possibility is a set.

a set is a well-defined collection of elements having common characeristics

Big people is a subjective term. This term may mean one thing to someone and another thing to other person. So this set is not well defined.

To set a good example to their pupils.