The certainty of a firm answer to this question is no match for the uncertainty of
"evident" as the deciding qualification.
Personally, I should think that in general, if two things are compared side-by-side,
then the one that's 186 times as thick as the other is probably the more evident,
but that's just an opinion with little analytical rigor.
A solid is a 3 dimensional object having length, width and height. Its volume measured in cubic units is length*width*height
The width of the path having an area of 111 square meters is 28.5 meters.
If you have the area then you can find the width by dividing the area by the length...having the length by itself is broad
cube
First: 36 cm2 cannot be a width. Width is a linear measure - a measure of distance - which would be measured in cm and not cm2. In any case, having just the width is not sufficient information for answering the question.
2D is flat, determined by a length and a width. 3D is determined by having a length, width, and height. 4D is determined by having a length, a width, a height, and a dimension in time.
A shape having the same dimensions of length, height and width is a cube. This can also be referred to as a square prism.
A solid is a 3 dimensional object having length, width and height. Its volume measured in cubic units is length*width*height
Having depth, width and height.
The width of the path having an area of 111 square meters is 28.5 meters.
If you have the area then you can find the width by dividing the area by the length...having the length by itself is broad
Square or cube
30cemtimeters
Planar.
cube
The perimeter of a rectangle having 1,000 units of width and 2,000 units of length is 6,000 units
2 dimensions is having only the dimensions of height and width, like a square. 3 dimensions is having height, width and depth, like a cube.