Yes. A null set is always a subset of any set. Also, any set is a subset of the [relevant] universal set.
Universal set.
The null set. It is a subset of every set.
null set ,universal set,cardinality set
Yes.
yes
I was told once that the null set is the compliment to the universal set... I'm not convinced of this, however because the null set is a subset of the universal set as well. While I can't think of anything offhand that would prevent both of these statements from being true, it seems to me that they are contradictory statements.
The null set. Every set is a subset of itself and so the null set is a subset of the null set.
A null set is a set with nothing in it. A set containing a null set is still containing a "null set". Therefore it is right to say that the null set is not the same as a set containing only the null set.
Because ''null'' means it has no particular set / thing so it's for anything. LOL! i hate K 12. Zobelian.
No. It can be infinite, finite or null. The set of odd integers is infinite, the set of even integers is infinite. Their intersection is void, or the null set.
A set is a collection of distinct objects, considered as a whole. A subset is a set whose elements are all contained within another set. The universal set is the set that contains all possible elements relevant to a particular discussion or problem. A null set, or empty set, is a set that contains no elements, while a cardinal set refers to the number of elements in a set, indicating its size.
There is only one null set. It is 'the' null set. It is a set which does not contain any numbers.