Yes. A null set is always a subset of any set. Also, any set is a subset of the [relevant] universal set.
Universal set.
The null set. It is a subset of every set.
null set ,universal set,cardinality set
yes
Yes.
I was told once that the null set is the compliment to the universal set... I'm not convinced of this, however because the null set is a subset of the universal set as well. While I can't think of anything offhand that would prevent both of these statements from being true, it seems to me that they are contradictory statements.
The null set. Every set is a subset of itself and so the null set is a subset of the null set.
A null set is a set with nothing in it. A set containing a null set is still containing a "null set". Therefore it is right to say that the null set is not the same as a set containing only the null set.
Because ''null'' means it has no particular set / thing so it's for anything. LOL! i hate K 12. Zobelian.
No. It can be infinite, finite or null. The set of odd integers is infinite, the set of even integers is infinite. Their intersection is void, or the null set.
There is only one null set. It is 'the' null set. It is a set which does not contain any numbers.
The null set is a set which has no members. It is an empty set.