Yes.
Not necessarily. If the statement is "All rectangles are polygons", the converse is "All polygons are rectangles." This converse is not true.
They are all rectangles (or 2 squares and 4 rectangles).They are all rectangles (or 2 squares and 4 rectangles).They are all rectangles (or 2 squares and 4 rectangles).They are all rectangles (or 2 squares and 4 rectangles).
No but all squares are a rectangles
No. Only some parallelograms are rectangles. But all rectangles are parallelograms.
No, but all squares are all rectangles.
Not necessarily. If the statement is "All rectangles are polygons", the converse is "All polygons are rectangles." This converse is not true.
Yes, it is.
A reversible statement is one where the truth of the statement would still hold if the subject and predicate were reversed. For example, "All squares are rectangles" is reversible because it is also true that "All rectangles are squares."
Which statement is ture about all adaptations
Which statement is ture about all adaptations
They are all rectangles (or 2 squares and 4 rectangles).They are all rectangles (or 2 squares and 4 rectangles).They are all rectangles (or 2 squares and 4 rectangles).They are all rectangles (or 2 squares and 4 rectangles).
Yes, all Squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares because it needs to have all equal sides.
Yes, all rectangles are parallelograms. However, not all parallelograms are rectangles.
It is NOT as case of 'Some'. It is ALL rectangles are parallelograms.
No. A rectangle is a parallelogram because all of its sides are parallel, but a parallelogram is not a rectangle because it does not have all right angles. It is a true statement to say that all rectangles are parallelograms. However, the statement that all parallelograms are rectangles is false. A parallelogram is a shape where its opposite sides are parallel to each other, including squares, hexagons, octagons, etc.
No but all squares are a rectangles
All rectangles are quadrilaterals.