answersLogoWhite

0

Is an indirect proof

Updated: 8/20/2019
User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

Best Answer

The first half of your sentence is missing.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is an indirect proof
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Fill in the blank A second type of proof in geometry is a proof by or indirect proof?

An indirect proof is a proof by contradiction.


A second type of proof in geometry is a proof by or indirect proof?

contradiction


What is an indirect proof?

An indirect proof is another name for a proof by contradiction. This is where the original premise is assumed to be false and then attempted to be proven. Because this proof turns out to be false, the original premise is then true.


Which term best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you what to prove?

Proof in which one assumes the opposite of what you have to prove is indirect proof. In indirect proof a person can draw a conclusion from assuming the opposite is true and then find a conclusion.


How do you do the indirect proof of ptolemy theorem?

o.o


What is a type of proof in which the statement is being proved is assumed to be false?

It is a type of indirect proof: more specifically, a proof by contradiction.


True or false In the body of an indirect proof you must show that the assumption leads to a contradiction?

TrueIt is true that the body of an indirect proof you must show that the assumption leads to a contradiction. In math a proof is a deductive argument for a mathematical statement.


True or false In the body of an indirect proof you must show that the assumption leads to a contradiction.?

TrueIt is true that the body of an indirect proof you must show that the assumption leads to a contradiction. In math a proof is a deductive argument for a mathematical statement.


What is another name for a proof of contradiction?

Proof by contradiction is also known by its Latin equivalent, reductio ad absurdum.


How does an indirect proof lead to the desired conclusion?

With an indirect proof, you temporarily assume that the opposite of what you're trying to prove is true. For example, let's say I'm trying to prove that the sky is blue. With an indirect proof, I would first say: "Assume temporarily that sky is not blue..." and go from there. Eventually, I will reach a contradiction and with this contradiction I can assume that this route of thinking is false, therefore my proof must be true.


In the body of an indirect proof you must show that the assumption leads to a contradiction?

true


Which term best describes a proof in which you assume the the opposite of what you want to prove?

The term that best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove is 'indirect proof'.