false
Assuming that you mean not (p or q) if and only if P ~(PVQ)--> P so now construct a truth table, (just place it vertical since i cannot place it vertical through here.) P True True False False Q True False True False (PVQ) True True True False ~(PVQ) False False False True ~(PVQ)-->P True True True False if it's ~(P^Q) -->P then it's, P True True False False Q True False True False (P^Q) True False False False ~(P^Q) False True True True ~(P^Q)-->P True True False False
false
It is false.
False because every quadrilateral is a four sided shape
consequentialism
Consequentialism is an attractive ethical approach because it provides clear and practical guidance – at least in situations where outcomes are easy to predict. The theory is also impartial.
Consequentialism says that right or wrong depend on the consequences of an act.
yes it is, he is the website which can help u... http://western-philosophy.suite101.com/article.cfm/deontology_and_consquentialism
Steven Sverdlik has written: 'Motive and rightness' -- subject(s): Intenties, Consequentialism (Ethics), Consequentialisme
The two elements of Utilitarianism philosophy are happiness and consequentialism. All that is associated with happiness is good. Utilitarianism is based on utility. The concepts of good and evil are weighed between what is good for the individual and what is good for the greater community. In Consequentialism, an act is judged on whether it causes happiness for a greater number of people.
Three main subdivisions of consequentialism are Ethical Egoism- morally right only if the consequences of an action is favorable only to the one performing an action. Utilitarianism- morally right if the consequences of an action is favorable to everyone. Ethical Altruism- morally right if the consequences of an action is favorable to everyone except to the one performing an action.
This is the fundamental question of the study of ETHICSand, as an entire field of inquiry, it is impossible to give a simple answer. There are numerous ethical frameworks such as: deontology, consequentialism, communal consequentialism, individualist, erratic, etc. Each framework may apply in general or to specific circumstances and then each framework may be subject to disagreement between its very proponents.
Consequentialism is the belief that the outcomes of actions, the consequences of certain normative properties decide the rightness or wrongness of the action. This is a moral or ethical theory that insists that the outcomes of any given action are what decided the good or badness of those actions. The major problem with such a belief is that it does little to inform the person acting on what is good or bad. In moral or ethical philosophies the greatest good to the greatest amount is generally accepted as the proper standard by which to judge an action. From a hedonist's point of view pleasure is good and pain is bad take that belief and combine it with consequentialism and suddenly skipping work to stay up all night at an orgy makes a whole lot of sense. Consequentialism can lead to many bad ideas. A member of a certain society allows the other members to sacrifice his or her life to the angry gods who have refused rain on the thirsty people. The society as a group murders this willing sacrifice so the gods might be appeased and suddenly it begins to rain and the people are saved. It was a good thing, by the rules of consequentialism, to murder that person and the consequences served the many. An extreme and primitive example, but it illustrates a major weakness in consequentilism.
False
The difference between the clasics and the moderns referring human nature virtue and ethics is deontological ethics (Kantianism) and consequentialism (utilitarianism)
False