No, because there is no greatest integer.
yes
No. It has a discontinuity at every integer value.
The value of the greatest integer is 76. This occurs when the set of five consecutive integers is all even numbers.
Largest in the sense that it is of greatest value? -1
9
To find the greatest integer plotted on a number line, you would look for the rightmost point marked on the line, as integers increase in value from left to right. If the number line is finite and has specific integers plotted, the greatest one will be the largest value among those points. If the number line extends infinitely, there is no greatest integer, as integers continue indefinitely.
The greatest integer that is less than -4 is -5. -5 is next largest integer, even though it has the smallest absolute value for the set of number <-4. This is because the less negative a value is, the greater it is, even though it's numeric component '5' is not the largest.
605
The absoluate value of a positive integer is the integer itself.The absoluate value of a positive integer is the integer itself.The absoluate value of a positive integer is the integer itself.The absoluate value of a positive integer is the integer itself.
The greatest integer function, often denoted as (\lfloor x \rfloor), returns the largest integer that is less than or equal to the given value (x). For example, (\lfloor 3.7 \rfloor) equals 3, while (\lfloor -2.3 \rfloor) equals -3. This function effectively "rounds down" any non-integer value to the nearest whole number.
The smallest positive integer is 1. 1 is the multiplicative identity; ie anything times 1 is itself. The greatest negative integer is the most positive negative integer which is -1. Therefore the product of the greatest negative integer and the smallest positive integer is the greatest negative integer which is -1.
There is no greatest integer. Whatever integer you think is greatest, you can always add one (1) to it and get a larger one.