answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Correlation is an estimate of a linear relationship between two variables and takes no account of non-linear relationship. If the relationship is quadratic and the domain is symmetric about some point, the correlation will be zero. It is, thus possible for the points on the scatter plot to lie exactly on a parabola while the calculated correlation is zero. In such a case, it is easy to make a prediction despite no correlation.

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6mo ago

No, it is not possible to make accurate predictions based on a scatter plot with no correlation. A scatter plot with no correlation means that the data points are randomly scattered and do not follow any specific pattern or trend. Without a correlation, it is difficult to establish a relationship between the variables and make reliable predictions.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is it possible to make a prediction based in a scatter plot with no correlation?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

What is based on prediction and extrapolation?

random coin flips and exponeous events


Which chart type would be the best candidate to spot trends and extrapolate information based on research data?

A scatter chart would be the best candidate to spot trends and extrapolate information based on research data.


Does the strength of correlation depend on the direction?

Absolutely not. The simplest way to demonstrate this is to consider a measure of agreement - disagreement. If we scored it so that "strongly agree" is 5 and "strongly disagree" is 1, we would get one value of the correlation. If we reverse-scored it, we would get exactly the same value, but with the opposite sign. The strength of the correlation is the same, but the direction of the relation has switched. Another consideration is the fact that the actual strength of the correlation is based on the square of its value. 0.20 squared is 0.04; 0.40 squared is 0.16. A correlation of 0.40 is four times as strong as a correlation of 0.20. But when you square something, you automatically lose the sign. The square of a negative number is positive. So by definition, correlations of the same size but different signs are equal in strength.


Why is it important to know the regression line?

Yes, that is what allows you to predict data values based on the information you have. It also tells you other things about the data set such as the correlation.


Which chart type would be the best candidate to spot trends and extrapolate information based on reseach data?

That will depend on the type of data and what you are looking for. You could use a line chart but even a bar chart or a scatter graph. ----------- If these are time series data, and assuming that you have sufficient data, I would suggest calculating spectra as a way of identifying possible trends.

Related questions

What type of graph can best help you predict the answer to information you never tested?

A scatter graph on the data you already have, then place a regression line ( line of best fit) across the points and predict the information based on this line. It obviously isn't accurate and is only a prediction and if there is no correlation in the plotted points and no line of best fit can be placed on there can be no prediction made.


What is the purpose of correlation charts in FT-IR?

1. The purpose of correlation chart are to measure or relate two variables and allow us to make a prediction about one variable based on what we know about another variable. For example, a correlation between the 2 known sample.


How is the value of the correlation coefficient related to the accuracy of the predicated value for a specific value x?

The nearer the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is to 1, the higher the accuracy of the predicted value. At r = 0, any prediction based on the independent variable is inaccurate - to the extent of being a waste of time.The nearer the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is to 1, the higher the accuracy of the predicted value. At r = 0, any prediction based on the independent variable is inaccurate - to the extent of being a waste of time.The nearer the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is to 1, the higher the accuracy of the predicted value. At r = 0, any prediction based on the independent variable is inaccurate - to the extent of being a waste of time.The nearer the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is to 1, the higher the accuracy of the predicted value. At r = 0, any prediction based on the independent variable is inaccurate - to the extent of being a waste of time.


Is a hypothesis a scientific prediction or possible explanation based on reasoning intuition and research?

Yes


Why there is no error analysis in prediction?

Since a prediction is based off of one's thoughts/understanding of the story.


A prediction that can be tested is a?

A prediction that can be tested is a hypothesis. According to the scientific method, a hypothesis is somewhat of an educated guess or a prediction based on something knowledgable.


What is a descriptive model based on a prediction?

hypothesis


Making a forecast of what will happen in the future based on past experience or evidence is called?

a prediction!!!


A descriptive model based upon a prediction?

hypothesis


Why is it important to say about wheb making a prediction?

The prediction is based on a trend line that approximates the locations of the related points.


What is hypothesis and prediction or are the responsible variables?

Hypothesis is more of a scientific guess while prediction is a more of a guess based on experience.


What is another word for prediction based on numbers?

an estimation or an estimate