No, it is not near a perfect number. The first four known perfect numbers are 6, 28, 496 and 8,128.
No, it is not near a perfect number. The first four known perfect numbers are 6, 28, 496 and 8,128.
87 is a not perfect square.
an example of a near perfect number is 2, 4 or 16.-these are near-perfect numbers because their factors add up to one less than the number itself.
22 is not a perfect number but 6, 28, 496 and 8128 are perfect numbers.
They are numbers that are NEAR PERFECT. a near perfect number is when its factors (exept the actual number) are added up and ALMOST equal the number ex. 16x1/2x8/4x4/ so its factors are 1,2,4,8 and 16 so add them ( exept the actual number) 1+2+4+8=15 so its NEAR PERFECT and a perfect number is a number that all its factors equal to its number ex. 6-1,2,3,6 are its factors all together-1+2+3=6 those are NEAR PERFECT and PERFECT numbers
No, it is not.
no
Yes, it is.
Assume that the expression is x8 - 87 + 166 or x8 + 79. The expression is not factorizable since 79 is not the perfect 8th number!
A near-perfect number is one that is close to being a perfect one (obvi). So to find out if it's perfect or not (there are other terms, but that doesn't really matter right now), you add up it's divisors other than itself. So for example: 6 is a perfect number because 1+2+3+6. 16 1+2+4+8=15, so thus it is near-perfect. The four perfect numbers are 6, 28, 496, 8128
a number when all the proper factors added up equals 1 less then your number