closer to one
Three-fifths is a fraction and there is no sensible way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is 0.
No. Integers are whole numbers and do not have any fraction or decimal part.
Three fifths of a piece.
let say for example you have 7 fifths. There are 5 fifths in a whole. You still have two fifths remaining and therefore the fraction becomes 1 and 2 fifths (1 2/5).
Three Fifths is not a whole number it's only 60% of a whole.
a mixed fraction is a number written out as a whole number plus a fraction: ex. 3 4/5 (three and four fifths) would be a mixed fraction. essentially a whole number plus a fraction (but it would actually be written without the plus sign).
it is not a whole numbr. it is a fraction
One whole minus two fifths is three fifths.
No, it is not an improper fraction. It is a whole number.
One whole and two fifths
Three is a whole number, not a fraction.
Two fifths, this is because 5 fifths is the whole and if you already have 3 fifths you just need 2 more to make 5.
It is 1.
yes because it is closer to one whole
20/5 as an improper fraction, or 4 as a whole number.
An integer is a whole number, not a fraction and three is a whole number
To the nearest whole number: 3
No because an integer is a whole number
A whole number combined with a proper fraction
13 / (2/5) in its simplest form, is an improper fraction and there is no way to express that as a whole number.
Slaves were counted as a whole instead of three fifths and the slaves were a lot cheaper in the time of war. Slaves were counted as a whole instead of three fifths and the slaves were a lot cheaper in the time of war.
Well, two whole are 10 fifths, and add them to the 3 you allready have, you get 13 fifths.