NO, it is a rational number but NOT an integer.
You get another integer that will take the sign from the larger of the two integers that were combined.
1/3 is not an integer, and there is no such thing as an interger. An integer is a whole number.
No, to be an integer it would have to be a whole number.
A rational number is one that can be expressed as one integer (whole number) over another integer. 4.89 = 489 ÷ 100 = 489/100 In this form 489 is an integer and 100 is an integer, so 4.89 can be expressed as one integer over another integer, thus it is a rational number.
allowed the slave states to count a slave as three-fifths of a person
When one of the multiplicands is an integer!
NO, it is a rational number but NOT an integer.
You get another integer that will take the sign from the larger of the two integers that were combined.
1/3 is not an integer, and there is no such thing as an interger. An integer is a whole number.
No, one half which is 1/2 is not a integer. Its a rational number.
No, to be an integer it would have to be a whole number.
There is no greatest integer. Whatever integer you think is greatest, you can always add one (1) to it and get a larger one.
A rational number is one that can be expressed as one integer (whole number) over another integer. 4.89 = 489 ÷ 100 = 489/100 In this form 489 is an integer and 100 is an integer, so 4.89 can be expressed as one integer over another integer, thus it is a rational number.
No. For any integer, you can add one to get an even greater integer.
A rational number is one which can be expressed as one integer over another (possibly the same) integer which is not zero. thirty thirds = 30/3 which is one integer over another integer → it is rational.
Not at all. Six times one half is three, and one half is not an integer.