0
Yes, theorems - once they have been proved - are valid evidence.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What type of reasoning does a mathematical proof use?
Deductive reasoning In mathematics, a proof is a deductive argument for a mathematical statement. Deductive reasoning, unlike inductive reasoning, is a valid form of proof. It is, in fact, the way in which geometric proofs are written.
What is the difference between a valid deductive argument and a fallacy?
A valid deductive argument will have a valid premise and conclusion and a fallacy may be true, it all matters on how you came to the conclusion.
Which types of reasons are not valid in a mathematical proof?
Unproven Theorems
What is sound reasoning in mathematics?
Sound reasoning is correct, valid, logical, believable reasoning.
What are the advantages of modern symbolic logic over classical logic?
What is the major difference between Symbolic logic and Aristotelian logic?1. Traditional Aristotelian logic (also called Classical Deductive Logic or Categorical Syllogisms) is an ancient method of deductive reasoning. Historians say that Aristotle, that ancient Greek philosopher guy, was the first to talk about syllogisms. In ancient Greece, men often first presented their arguments in syllogisms, and then they gave their arguments in a more rhetorical form. Men were held to a higher standard back then. This branch of logic gave us such famous lines of reasoning as:All men are mortal.Socrates is a man.Therefore, Socrates is mortal.2. Modern Symbolic Logic is another method of deductive reasoning developed after the seventeenth century. Gottfried Leibniz and other logicians had a vision for a more simple and useful method for translating ordinary reasoning into a universal language of symbols. Among other things, this method can more quickly analyze longer arguments to see if they are valid. This method of deductive reasoning made logic even more "mathematical." It also made it uglier.This translates into:If p is true, then q is true.p is true.Therefore, q is true.
Is a valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning?
The valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning helps you come with an informed decision based on the evidence presented.
Which is a valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning?
The valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning helps you come with an informed decision based on the evidence presented.
What type of reasoning does a mathematical proof use?
Deductive reasoning In mathematics, a proof is a deductive argument for a mathematical statement. Deductive reasoning, unlike inductive reasoning, is a valid form of proof. It is, in fact, the way in which geometric proofs are written.
What is a reasonable argument?
A "reasoned argument" is a series of statements that use evidence and reasoning to persuade someone to accept or reject a particular opinion. A special case of a reasoned argument is the valid deductive argument. If you accept the premises of a valid deductive argument, then it would be absurd to reject its conclusion. Unfortunately, in many cases it is impossible to put together a valid deductive argument either for or against some important statement. And so we must muddle along with whatever weaker evidence and weaker reasoning we have available to form a reasoned argument and come to some useful opinion one way or the other. Unfortunately, too many people make statements without any evidence or reasoning at all.
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS A VALID FORM OF EVIDENCE OF DEDUCTIVE REASONING?
A valid deduction is that you posted the question without checking what it said!The question asks about the "following". In those circumstances would it be too much to expect that you make sure that there is something that is following?
Valid in a sentence?
His argument was valid because it was supported by strong evidence and logical reasoning.
What is the difference between a valid deductive argument and a fallacy?
A valid deductive argument will have a valid premise and conclusion and a fallacy may be true, it all matters on how you came to the conclusion.
Which types of reasons are not valid in a mathematical proof?
Unproven Theorems
Do the theorems for junior certificate maths have to be exactly right or do they just have to make sense?
There is more than one way to prove a given mathematical proposition. If the sequence of reasoning is valid, then the proof is correct. That is all that is required.
What is sound reasoning in mathematics?
Sound reasoning is correct, valid, logical, believable reasoning.
How do you know if a conclusion is valid?
You can probably never be entirely sure, but if you know about the subject, and use correct methods, you improve your chances of reaching a correct conclusion. For important conclusions, you may want to have your reasoning checked by other people.-------------List all the assumptions and use logic decuctive reasoning to see if it is valid. Deductive reasoning is a fixed set of rules how certain conclusions can follow from assumpions. Wikipedia example:All men are mortalSocrates is a manTherefore, Socrates is mortal
What will the The truth table for a valid deductive argument show?
that the premises are false.
