0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Rafa
Maxine
EzraAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why do you do proofs in geometry?
You start out with things that you know and use them to make logical arguments about what you want to prove. The things you know may be axioms, or may be things you already proved and can use. The practice of doing Geometry proofs inspires logical thinking, organization, and reasoning based on facts. Each statement must be supported with a valid reason, which could be a given fact, definitions, postulates, or theorems.
Euclids geometry has been questioned but never has a nonEuclidean geometry been accepted as a valid possibility?
false
Euclid's geometry has been questioned but never has a non-Euclidean geometry been accepted as a valid possibility?
False
How do you determine if the points on a graph are invalid?
Plug the x-values into the original equation. If you get the same y-values, then the points are valid.
Convert cubic yard to square feet area?
This is not a valid conversion. Cubic units is a measure of volume while square units is a measure of area.
Is a valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning?
The valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning helps you come with an informed decision based on the evidence presented.
Which is a valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning?
The valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning helps you come with an informed decision based on the evidence presented.
Is theorems a form of valid evidence in deductive reasoning?
Yes, theorems - once they have been proved - are valid evidence.
What type of reasoning does a mathematical proof use?
Deductive reasoning In mathematics, a proof is a deductive argument for a mathematical statement. Deductive reasoning, unlike inductive reasoning, is a valid form of proof. It is, in fact, the way in which geometric proofs are written.
What is the Advantage of deductive?
Deductive reasoning allows for logical conclusions to be drawn from given premises, ensuring that the argument is valid if the premises are true. It provides a structured approach to reasoning, making it easier to follow and evaluate the logic of an argument. Additionally, deductive reasoning can lead to clear and definitive conclusions when used correctly.
Why is deductive reasoning stronger that inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises that are assumed to be true. In deductive reasoning, if the premises are true and the logic is valid, then the conclusion must also be true. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations, which makes it more prone to errors and uncertainties.
What is meant by deductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is a logical process where specific conclusions are drawn from general principles or premises. It involves moving from a general statement to a specific conclusion, with the aim of being logically valid. This type of reasoning is frequently used in mathematics and philosophy.
What is proved by utilizing deductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning allows for drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises. It proves that if the premises are true and the reasoning is valid, the conclusion must necessarily follow. It is a powerful tool for establishing the logical connections between ideas.
What Deductive reasoning is much better than inductive reasoning.?
Deductive reasoning involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, leading to more certain outcomes compared to inductive reasoning, which involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations. Deductive reasoning follows a top-down approach, moving from the general to the specific, and is commonly used in mathematics and formal logic to guarantee valid conclusions.
What is a type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific observations?
One type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific observations is called modus ponens. This form of reasoning involves affirming the antecedent to reach a valid conclusion.
What is a reasonable argument?
A reasonable argument is one that is logical, supported by evidence, and free from fallacies or emotional manipulation. It should be based on sound reasoning and relevant information, leading to a conclusion that is justified and persuasive. In essence, a reasonable argument is one that can withstand critical scrutiny and is open to being evaluated and potentially revised based on new evidence or counterarguments.
Why is deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?
because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas
