Yes
12q 12,q 6,2,q 3,2,2,q
There is no biggest prime and the proof is quite simple. Suppose P were the biggest prime. Multiply together all the primes from 2 upto P. Call this number Q. Add 1 so that your final number is Q+1. Now, divide Q+1 by any prime. The prime will go into Q (by the way Q is defined) and so, when dividing Q+1, there will be a remainder of 1. So Q+1 cannot be divided by any prime fro 2 to P so Q+1 is itself a prime. And the way in which it was defined Q+1 is MUCH bigger than P.
The next prime number after the composite number of 16 is 17
Small words make a difference. No prime number "has" a factor of 16. But 2 is the only prime number that "is" a factor of 16.
No because the amount of numbers is infinite and there is no pattern to suggest that the amount of prime numbers is not infinite. * * * * * In fact, there is a relatively simple proof that there is no biggest prime. Suppose P were the biggest prime. Multiply together all the primes from 2 upto P. Call this number Q. Add 1 so that your final number is Q+1. Now, divide Q+1 by any prime. The prime will go into Q (by the way Q is defined) and so, when dividing Q+1, there will be a remainder of 1. So Q+1 cannot be divided by any prime fro 2 to P so Q+1 is itself a prime. And the way in which it was defined Q+1 is MUCH bigger than P.
The factors of 16 are 1,2,4,8 & 16. A prime number is only divisible by itself and 1. Therefore the only prime number is 2.
It can be. 16 is relatively prime with 25.
Srsly?No. 16 is not a prime number. It is an even number, and even numbers are never prime.Except for the number 2.
composite
13 is the only prime number between 12 and 16.
The only prime factor of 16 is 2.
No it is not.