It can be expressed as -64/10.
Take the average of the two. The average of two rational numbers is (a) rational, and (b) between the two numbers.
No because all integers are rational numbers
Rational numbers form a proper subset of real numbers. So all rational numbers are real numbers but all real numbers are not rational.
They are numbers which are written in the form p/q where p and q are integers.
192/3 = 64/1 which is 64
-- There's an infinite number of rational numbers. -- There's an infinite number of irrational numbers. -- There are more irrational numbers than rational numbers. -- The difference between the number of irrational numbers and the number of rational numbers is infinite.
Take the average of the two. The average of two rational numbers is (a) rational, and (b) between the two numbers.
No because all integers are rational numbers
8
Rational numbers form a proper subset of real numbers. So all rational numbers are real numbers but all real numbers are not rational.
They are numbers which are written in the form p/q where p and q are integers.
64 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 64/1.
192/3 = 64/1 which is 64
The real numbers.
The set of Real numbers.
Rational numbers are numbers which can be written in the form p/q where p and q are integers and q > 0. Rationals is often used as an abbreviation to refer to the set of all rational numbers.
Yes. By definition, all rational numbers can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, the second of which is not zero. That is the fractional form of rational numbers.