i don’t know I am Englis
0.5
There are a lot of useful techniques. If it's a sequence defined recursively, like an = an-1 / 2 then you can set an = an-1 and solve for that. If it's defined more simply, like an = 1/2n, you can consider the behaviour of the sequence as n goes to infinity (These are both the same sequence, with limit 0). I don't think either of these ways are really considered rigorous though, even though they lead you to the correct answer. To formally prove the convergence of a sequence, you can either use the delta-epsilon or the Cauchy method if it is in Rk In the delta-epsilon method, you just need to show that for any ε > 0, there exists a δ such that if you have two n1, n2 so that |n1 - n2| < δ, d(an1 - an2) < ε. To show a function fulfills the Cauchy criterion, you need to show that for any ε > 0, you can find an N so that for all n1, n2 > N, d(an1 - an2) < ε, but this is only a valid proof of convergence in Rk
google sequence diagram object constructor
Yeah do it, I dare you.
A timeline
sequence, schedule, show
use a Timeline
They show him in the flashback/dream sequence.
The beginning sequence of that show is shot in Providence, RI. However, most of the filming of that show was done in California.
The sequence is yellow purple purple yellow! :)
A water cycle is a sequence of stages that show the way water condenses and evaporates.
No. Although the ratios of the terms in the Fibonacci sequence do approach a constant, phi, in order for the Fibonacci sequence to be a geometric sequence the ratio of ALL of the terms has to be a constant, not just approaching one. A simple counterexample to show that this is not true is to notice that 1/1 is not equal to 2/1, nor is 3/2, 5/3, 8/5...