Many felt that Sacco and Vanzetti were convicted because of xenophobia.
Many Felt that Sacco and Vanzetti were convicted because of xenophobia. (Apex)
all of the above-apexvs
Many felt that sacco and vanzetti were convicted because of xenophobia
Guilty.
Sacco and Vanzetti were immigrants, anarchists and they were convicted of murder. Explanation: Sacco and Vanzetti were immigrants in the United States from Italy, they are believed to be followers of Luigi Galleani, an Italian anarchist. Gallenist group was on top of the united states' dangerous enemies list.
I strongly believe that Bartolomeo Vanzetti's last statement was true because Moore's statement was not tangible.
the trial and execution of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti.
true
they were immigrants, anarchists,and murderers
A case in which a statement is not true can be illustrated by the statement "All birds can fly." This statement is false because there are bird species, such as ostriches and penguins, that are unable to fly. Thus, the existence of these flightless birds provides a clear counterexample that disproves the universal claim made in the statement.
Proof by Converse is a logical fallacy where one asserts that if the converse of a statement is true, then the original statement must also be true. However, this is not always the case as the converse of a statement may not always hold true even if the original statement is true. It is important to avoid this error in logical reasoning.
It depends on the case and the circumstances, but this question COULD be a true statement.