Counterexample
In computing, this is an AND statement.
No, it is not a true statement. It is a false statement.
true
Yes, a statement can be true or false but without knowing what the statement is no-one can possibly say whether it is true or it is false.
true
all of the above-apexvs
Proof by Converse is a logical fallacy where one asserts that if the converse of a statement is true, then the original statement must also be true. However, this is not always the case as the converse of a statement may not always hold true even if the original statement is true. It is important to avoid this error in logical reasoning.
It depends on the case and the circumstances, but this question COULD be a true statement.
If the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then "This statement is false" is true, making the statement false. But if the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then... It's one of the biggest paradoxes ever, just like saying, "I'm lying right now."
Circular logic would be a statement or series of statements that are true because of another statement, which is true because of the first. For example, statement A is true because statement B is true. Statement B is true because statement A is true
Switch case can be flowcharted using a diamond for each case, with a right branch for true and a down branch for false. The false branch simply connects to the next case. The true branch connects to the statement that should be executed for that case. Where multiple cases result in the same statement, the true branches should converge upon that statement. The execution path from the statement(s) should converge with the final false branch of the switch case. In this case, your switch case might be as as follows: print %letter% switch lowercase (%letter%) { case 'a': case 'e': case 'i': case 'o': case 'u': print line " is vowel" break; default: print line " is not vowel" } Thus you will have a column of diamonds for each case with false branches linking downwards from one diamond to the next. The statement for case 'a', 'e', 'i', 'o' and 'u' is the same, so their true branches (extending to the right) will converge upon the 'print line " is vowel"' statement which must be placed to the right of the case diamonds. The default case's true branch leads to the 'print line " is not vowel"' statement. Both these statements will then converge with the false branch from the default case, marking the end of the switch case. Note that, logically, there is no false branch from a default case, thus this link may be omitted. However, all links from all statements must still converge below the default case.
Counterexample
Many felt that Sacco and Vanzetti were convicted because of xenophobia.
This statement is true. The reason behind it is because not every woman is made the same. Not to mention, not every woman will be in the same physiological state either.
In computing, this is an AND statement.
always true