Hey Guys! I'm Not Sure That's Why I Am Asking You!.
multiply by the reciprocal of the whole number
let x = whole number let y = a/b |------------| | z = x/y | |------------| a, b can have any real value. OR: You multiply the whole number by the dinamanator (botton number of the fraction), then you divid the answer by the numanator (top number of the fraction) You get your answer but it you might be able to put it in smallest terms.......THEN ALL DONE!! I hope it was helpful
-041666 is an integer and not a fraction so it makes little sense to write it as a fraction. But, if you must, one equivalent is -41666/1.-041666 is an integer and not a fraction so it makes little sense to write it as a fraction. But, if you must, one equivalent is -41666/1.-041666 is an integer and not a fraction so it makes little sense to write it as a fraction. But, if you must, one equivalent is -41666/1.-041666 is an integer and not a fraction so it makes little sense to write it as a fraction. But, if you must, one equivalent is -41666/1.
586 is an integer and it makes little sense to convert it to a fraction.
The question makes no sense: any fraction IS a number. So there is nothing to find!
A percentage IS a fraction, so the question makes little sense.
112 is an integer and it makes no sense to write it as a fraction. However, if you must, it is 112/1
79 is an integer and it makes little sense to turn it into a fraction. But, if you must, it is 79/1.
110 is an integer whole number, not a fraction. Your question makes no sense.
33/11 = 3. That is an integer and it makes no sense to convert it back into a fraction!
Although it makes no sense to do it, you could write is as 3/1Although it makes no sense to do it, you could write is as 3/1Although it makes no sense to do it, you could write is as 3/1Although it makes no sense to do it, you could write is as 3/1
The question makes no sense. There's no such thing as a "biggest fraction"; name any valid finite fraction and I will name a larger one.