Best Answer

They are the integer part of the irrational number and the successor to that integer. Thus, for pi, the two integers are 3 and 4.

Q: What are the two closest integers for each irrational number?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

Irrational numbers are infinitely dense. Between any two numbers, there are infinitely many irrational numbers. So if it was claimed that some irrational, x, was the closest irrational to 6, it is possible to find an infinite number of irrationals between 6 and x. Each one of these infinite number of irrationals would be closer to 6 than x. So the search for the nearest irrational must fail.

Such numbers cannot be ordered in the manner suggested by the question because: For every whole number there are integers, rational numbers, natural numbers, irrational numbers and real numbers that are bigger. For every integer there are whole numbers, rational numbers, natural numbers, irrational numbers and real numbers that are bigger. For every rational number there are whole numbers, integers, natural numbers, irrational numbers and real numbers that are bigger. For every natural number there are whole numbers, integers, rational numbers, irrational numbers and real numbers that are bigger. For every irrational number there are whole numbers, integers, rational numbers, natural numbers and real numbers that are bigger. For every real number there are whole numbers, integers, rational numbers, natural numbers and irrational numbers that are bigger. Each of these kinds of numbers form an infinite sets but the size of the sets is not the same. Georg Cantor showed that the cardinality of whole numbers, integers, rational numbers and natural number is the same order of infinity: aleph-null. The cardinality of irrational numbers and real number is a bigger order of infinity: aleph-one.

Rational numbers include integers, and any number you can write as a fraction (with integers in the numerator and denominator). Most numbers that include roots (square roots, cubic roots, etc.) are irrational - if you take the square root of any integer except a perfect square, for example, you'll get an irrational number. Expressions involving pi and e are also usuallyirrational.

It is not an irrational number. Otherwise, it belongs to each of the sets listed above.

There are an infinite number of integers, fractions, decimals, and irrational numbers. (Each of the types of numbers also has an infinite series.) Arabic numbers are formed using 10 symbols (9 integers and zero) : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, and 0. All non-variables are represented using these symbols.numbers do not end

Related questions

Irrational numbers are infinitely dense. Between any two numbers, there are infinitely many irrational numbers. So if it was claimed that some irrational, x, was the closest irrational to 6, it is possible to find an infinite number of irrationals between 6 and x. Each one of these infinite number of irrationals would be closer to 6 than x. So the search for the nearest irrational must fail.

Such numbers cannot be ordered in the manner suggested by the question because: For every whole number there are integers, rational numbers, natural numbers, irrational numbers and real numbers that are bigger. For every integer there are whole numbers, rational numbers, natural numbers, irrational numbers and real numbers that are bigger. For every rational number there are whole numbers, integers, natural numbers, irrational numbers and real numbers that are bigger. For every natural number there are whole numbers, integers, rational numbers, irrational numbers and real numbers that are bigger. For every irrational number there are whole numbers, integers, rational numbers, natural numbers and real numbers that are bigger. For every real number there are whole numbers, integers, rational numbers, natural numbers and irrational numbers that are bigger. Each of these kinds of numbers form an infinite sets but the size of the sets is not the same. Georg Cantor showed that the cardinality of whole numbers, integers, rational numbers and natural number is the same order of infinity: aleph-null. The cardinality of irrational numbers and real number is a bigger order of infinity: aleph-one.

It is not an irrational number but is each of the others.

Rational numbers include integers, and any number you can write as a fraction (with integers in the numerator and denominator). Most numbers that include roots (square roots, cubic roots, etc.) are irrational - if you take the square root of any integer except a perfect square, for example, you'll get an irrational number. Expressions involving pi and e are also usuallyirrational.

An irrational number is a number that can't be expressed by a fraction having integers in both its numerator and denominator. A rational number can be. 2 is rational. The square root of 2 is irrational.

It is not an irrational number. Otherwise, it belongs to each of the sets listed above.

Each is a multiplicand.

Let `a` be a rational number and `b` be an irrational number,assume that the sum is rational. 1.a +b =c Where a and c are rational and b is irrational. 2.b=c-a Subtracting the same number a from each side. 3.b is irrational c-a is a rational number we arrived at a contradiction. So the sum is an irrational number.

There are an infinite number of integers, fractions, decimals, and irrational numbers. (Each of the types of numbers also has an infinite series.) Arabic numbers are formed using 10 symbols (9 integers and zero) : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, and 0. All non-variables are represented using these symbols.numbers do not end

It is not possible to divide one rational number by another to obtain an irrational number. A rational number is of the form a/b where a and b are both integers, whereas an irrational is a number which is impossible to express in the previously mentioned way. Let A=(a/b) and B=(c/d) where A and B are both rational numbers. Consider the quotient A/B, this is the same as A(1/B). Rewrite this as (a/b)x(d/c). Assuming we all know basic arithmetic with fractions we can clearly see that the dividend is axd and the divisor is bxc, and the new expression is (axd)/(bxc). Since a, b, c, and d are all integers and the integers are closed under multiplication (two integers multiplied by each other produce another integer) our new expression as a single fraction is one integer over another and it is therefore a rational number.

Each integer is a whole number and each whole number is an integer. So the set of all integers is the same as the set of all whole numbers. By the equivalence of sets, integers and whole numbers are the same.

Each integer is a whole number and each whole number is an integer. So the set of all integers is the same as the set of all whole numbers. By the equivalence of sets, integers and whole numbers are the same.