Accuracy.
strongly agree
The adverb for agree is agreeably.An adverb describes a verb. An example would be The elderly lady spoke agreeably to the young man who helped her across the speak.
No. Agreed, meaning to hold the same view, is an adjective.A verb would be agree. As in "to agree with".A verb is a word that describes an action (run, walk, etc), a state of being (exist, stand, etc) or occurrence (happen, become, etc).An adjective is a word that describes a noun (the car is blue / it was a cold day / etc).
It is convenient for different people to agree on the standard order of operations. This saves complicated explanations.
Because measurement would have no meaning, unless we agree what we are measuring by. If I say that it takes 14 BGs to fill an autograft- we need to agree what a BG is, and what an autograft is, or it is meaningless. If you say that a yard is about so big, and I say that it is smaller... do you not see the problem here? Standard units are necessary, or we are talking about different things, entirely. If I count to ten, but you skip 9 and go to 11, we are talking about different things. Thus, we have a standard model of math, and a standard model (several to choose from) of measurements. The bottom line answer is this: so we are talking about the same thing.
cell
Absolute value
It depends on the results of your experiment.
The conclusion in your scientific reports should include: * what were the assumptions and what results were you expecting before doing the experiment * what method(s) or approach(es) did you use in the experiment * what are the results? * do your results agree or support with your assumptions? If yes, why? If no, what do you suggest to do for the next experiment. Preferably, the conclusion is much shorter than the body of your report. One paragraph can suffice, but try to keep it less than 2 typewritten pages. Be concise. Keep your sentences short. This section may be the only one that your peers or superiors will read. ==================
Sometimes results of a particular experiment do not match our hypothesis. Most of the time in such a case hypothesis is modified to agree to the experimental data. Another approach can be repeating the same experiment again and comparing the the values form the second trial to the first one.
When one of the confederates didn't agree :)
strongly agree
A "standard". In manufacturing, it may be refered to as a "master" when used to calibrate instruments that measure size, but it is still a standard.
A Standard.
That makes everything easier to understand, avoids the requirement for a lot of conversion between different units, and avoids confusion (among other things, some ancient units have different definitions in different regions). Also, the standard units used (the SI units) are consistent with one another, making many formulae simpler.
is meant by measurement in che mistry
If a theory does not agree with the experiments designed to test it, than either the experiment is faulty and needs to be fixed or the theory needs to be reviewed and reconsidered..