It would either mean subraction or negative.
For example:
If the equation looked like this:
(+4) - (+8)
than the - means subraction.
But, if the equation looked like this:
(+4) + (-8)
than that means the 8 or whatever number it is, is a negative number.
There is no such thing as "solving integers". You can solve an equation, which means finding all the unknowns in that equation, but you can't solve an integer.
isolation of the variable means to get the variable on one side of the equation and the integers on the other side
There are an infinite number of positive integers that satisfy the equation x^4 + y < 70.
Yes, it is an integer sequence.
It is a trivial difference. If you multiply every term in the equation with rational numbers by the common multiple of all the rational numbers then you will have an equation with integers.
It is customary to use integers.
The standard form of an equation is Ax + By = C. In this type of equation, x and y are variables while A, B, and C are integers.
Your question is not well formed, but i assume you mean 3 consecutive integers that sum to -363. If that is the case solve the following equation: (n-1) + (n) + (n+1) = -363 to give you the middle integer.
Well the subtraction of integers is not a comunative because it's not a property it can't be true it's a algebraic equation
-9
Add the integers together, then divide it by the number of integers there are, (in this case 5)
yes * * * * * No it does not. A transcendental number is not rational. It is irrational but, further than that, it is not the root of any polynomial equation with rational coefficients.