There is no set of three consecutive integers for 106.
The sum of the squares of the three consecutive integers 11, 13, 15 = 515
There are no three consecutive odd integers who's sum equals 13.
20,21 and 22 are three consecutive integers whose sum is 63. 20+21+22
The integers are -19, -18 and -17.
There is no set of three consecutive integers for 187.
Three consecutive integers have a sum of 12. What is the greatest of these integers?
Well, hot diggity dog! Let's break it down like a boss. If the sum of three consecutive odd integers is 363, then the middle number must be 121. Why? Because 121 is one-third of 363. So, the numbers are 119, 121, and 123. Bingo bango!
There is no set of three consecutive integers for 106.
There is no set of three consecutive integers whose sum is 71.
The sum of three consecutive integers is -72
9240 is the product of the three consecutive integers 20, 21, and 22.
The sum of the squares of the three consecutive integers 11, 13, 15 = 515
There must be three consecutive integers to guarantee that the product will be divisible by 6. For the "Product of three consecutive integers..." see the Related Question below.
Find 2 consecutive ODD integers whose sum is -88 ANSWER: -45, -43
There are no three consecutive odd integers who's sum equals 13.
That isn't possible. The three consecutive number are assumed to be integers; the sum of three consecutive integers is always a multiple of 3 (try it out).