Best Answer

The answer is an imaginary number, because of the negative under the square root. The same number multiplied together will always be a positive number. For example, if you square negative one, the answer is positive one, because a negative times a negative is a positive. Because a square root undoes a square, there is no solution to the square root of a negative number. That's why your calculator could not compute this problem.

However, there is a way to solve these types of problems by using imaginary numbers. The answer is 13i, where i is the square root of negative one.

🙏

🤨

😮

Study guides

Q: Why is there no solution to the square root of -169?

Write your answer...

Submit

Related questions

Yes, it is the square root of (-169)*(-169) = 28,561

13 is the square root of 169.

The square root of 169 is 13

The square root of 169 = ± 13

if p² = 169, then p = ±√169 In other words, take the square root of 169 and p is either the positive or negative value of the square root.

169. 13 x 13 = 169. square root of 169 = 13.

-13 or +13 are both square root of 169, but we often use the positive square root, 13, as the principal square root.

The square root of the number 169, is 13 because when 13 is multiplied by itself, it results to 169.

Square roots are + or - . So the best way to write this square root is Â± 169.

194

169

If you mean 2 times the square root of 169 then it is 26

Yes because the square root of 169 is 13 which is a rational number

The square root of 144 (12*12) and the square root of 169 (13*13).

Side of a square= take out the square root Area=169cm ² Square root of 169= 13 Side= 13 cm²

Yes, because the square root of 169 is 13 which is a rational number

The square root of 169 is 13, because 13 x 13 = 169.

The square root of 169 is 13 which is a rational and also a prime number

The square root of the fraction 16 over 169 is 4 over 13.

assuming that the question is "what is the square root of 169?" the answer is 13

13 x 13= 169

13x13=16913

√ -169 = 13i

√169 = 13

The square root of 169 is Â±13. There is point in putting that back in radical form to âˆš169, is there?