Since Celsius degrees are larger than Fahrenheit degrees, above -40 degrees (where the scales coincide) any number in Celsius will be hotter than the corresponding number in Fahrenheit.
low
Magnification is inversely proportional to the diameter of the field of view.
92
92 degrees is on possibility. The answer is NOT "an obtuse angle". An angle of 90.5 degrees, for example, is an obtuse angle but is not included in the range specified in the question.
this term is often confused with angle of field and field of view. The angle of view is the (diagonal) angle subtended by the scene captured in the photograph. This establishes the disc of best definition required for the lens. The angle of field is the angle subtended at the lens rear nodal point by the diagonal of the format itself. In a rectilinear image this is the same as the angle of view, but not for anamorphic images such as those produced by fisheye lenses. 'Field of view' simply describes the area covered in a scene. For example, although the angle of view of a fisheye lens is 180 degrees, its angle of field may be as low as 90 degrees. The field of view may be described as 'horizon to horizon'. For a standard (prime) lens the angle of field is typically 50-55 degrees, the same as the angle of view, and the field of view is roughly the same as that of the eye in a normal viewing of a scene or a picture.
92 degrees Fahrenheit = 33.3 degrees Celsius.
92 degrees Fahrenheit = 33.3 degrees Celsius
C = 5/9 (F - 32) = 5/9 (92 - 32) = 5/9 (60) = 33 and 1/3 degrees C.
No, is Celsius is hotter than 92 degrees Fahrenheit
Any polygon can gave an interior angle of 92 degrees. However, no regular polygon can have interior angles of 92 degrees.
Pacific Ocean
The 3rd angle is: 180-92-45 = 43 degrees
It is: 5/9*(92-32) = 33.33 degrees Celsius
Since Celsius degrees are larger than Fahrenheit degrees, above -40 degrees (where the scales coincide) any number in Celsius will be hotter than the corresponding number in Fahrenheit.
34 degrees S 92 degrees N
low