answersLogoWhite

0

What is equavalit set?

User Avatar

Anonymous

10y ago
Updated: 8/21/2019

I assume the question is meant to be about equivalent sets.

Two sets are said to be equivalent if they have the same cardinality. For finite sets, it means that they must both have the same number of distinct elements. More generally, two sets are equivalent if (and only if) there exists a one-to-one mapping (bijection) from one set to the other. This definition applies to equivalence of infinite sets but does give rise to some counter-intuitive results. For example, the set of all integers is equivalent to its proper subset, the set of all odd integers. The mapping for all to evens is x-> 2x.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the set of every set?

the set of every set is that set


What is a mull set?

null set or empty set, is a set with no elements.


What is the noun for the collective noun set?

The noun 'set' is a standard collective noun for:a set of bowlsa set of cutlerya set of dishesa set of golf clubsa set of knivesa set of mathematiciansa set of oystersa set of sailsa set of tires


A set that contains no elements is called an set or a set?

Empty set or null set


Is empty set a set and how?

empty set is a set because its name indicate as it is the set.


Why empty set is a set?

The concept of closure: If A and B are sets the intersection of sets is a set. Then if the intersection of two sets is a set and that set could be empty but still a set. The same for union, a set A union set Null is a set by closure,and is the set A.


What is a set that is contained in a larger set?

The set contained in another set is termed as a sub-set.


What is the meaning of null set?

A null set is a set that does not contain any elements, an empty set.


Is it right saying that the null set is not equal to the set containing null set as its only element?

A null set is a set with nothing in it. A set containing a null set is still containing a "null set". Therefore it is right to say that the null set is not the same as a set containing only the null set.


Prove that the boundary of a set is involved in that set only when this set is a closed set?

That is the definition of a closed set.


Is the complement of a set is the set of all things that are in the set true or false?

false, because the complement of a set is the set of all elements that are not in the set.


What is sub set?

sub set is set