Best Answer

Generalized Least Square Method also called Least Cubic Method

Q: What is generalized least square method?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

"Least Cubic Method" Also called "Generalized the Least Square Method", is new Method of data regression.

Because the sum of the deviations would, by definition, always be zero. So there is nothing to be minimised to improve the fit.

This method was governed by a variational principle applied to a certain function. The resulting variational relation was then treated by introducing some unknown multipliers in connection with constraint relations. After the elimination of these multipliers the generalized momenta were found to be certain functions of the partial derivatives of the Hamilton Jacobi function with respect to the generalized coordinates and the time. Then the partial differential equation of the classical Hamilton-Jacobi method was modified by inserting these functions for the generalized momenta in the Hamiltonian of the system.

A square prism (a cuboid with at least two square faces at its ends).

Scientists tools are are test tubes magnifying glass, beakers,and Bunsen burners.

Related questions

Generalized Least Square Method also called Least Cubic Method

"Least Cubic Method" Also called "Generalized the Least Square Method", is new Method of data regression.

The disadvantages are that the calculations required are not simple and that the method assumes that the same linear relationship is applicable across the whole data range. And these are the disadvantages of the least squares method.

High sensetivity to outliers (i.e. Extreme observation)

Because the sum of the deviations would, by definition, always be zero. So there is nothing to be minimised to improve the fit.

A scatter diagram will give a quick but rough extimate of the trend line - especially if there is a lot of variation about the trend. The least squares method will be more accurate.

The square root of 196 is 14, no matter what method you use. If you work a math problem two different ways and get different answers, then at least one of them is wrong, and there's a good chance that both of them are.

Square roots are computed using the Babylonian method, calculators, Newton's method, or the Rough estimation method. * * * * * Or the Newton-Raphson method.

blank= exception

Because the scientific method is just that -- a generalized way to discover answers that will vary with each experiment

26 is the least integer whose square root is an irrational number between 5 and 7. This is apparent as the square root of the previous integer (25) is a rational number and since the division method for calculating the square root produces a decimal that continues infinitely without repetition.

The square root of 366,025 is 605. I don't know the division method, but that doesn't matter. The result is the same no matter what method you use to find it. If you work the same problem by two different methods and get two different answers, then at least one of them is wrong, and there's a good chance that they both are.