Actually seeing the relationship between the volumes of a cone (one-third of a cylinder) and a sphere (two-thirds of a cylinder) is hard to beat. The cylinder is 1/3 the volume of the cone
A sphere to a cone is the same as a circle is to a triangle but they are both 3 dimensional.
sphere has 1 face and no vertex and it rolls but cone has 2 faces and it can roll and it has 1 vertex
The ancient Greek mathematician Archimedes proved that the volume of a sphere is four times that of the cone with base equal to a great circle of the sphere and height the radius of the sphere. Maybe this is what the poser of the question meant.
They are all 3D geometric shapes.
No, it is not.
The height of the cone of maximum volume that can be inscribed in a sphere of radius 12 cm is not 16 cm; it is actually 16 cm when considering the relationship between the cone's dimensions and the sphere's radius. The cone's volume is maximized when its height is two-thirds of the sphere's radius, which means the optimal height is ( \frac{2}{3} \times 12 \text{ cm} = 8 \text{ cm} ). Thus, the statement is incorrect; the correct height for maximum volume is 8 cm, not 16 cm.
cone
The cone has one. Neither the cylinder nor the sphere has any.
Sphere
A cone could be a party hat && a sphere couldd be a bowling ball.
the relationship between them is that they are use in many ways of living
No a sphere is a solid with no vortexes, faces, or edges while a cone has two faces, one vortex, and one edge.