there is no missing number of 2 for 2 is already the exact unit there is no other number with the same amount though it may be shown in many ways they all mean 2
The missing number is 5. When a number is divided by 3, the remainder is 2. So, the number can be represented as 3n + 2, where n is an integer. If we add 3 to this number, the remainder will be 1. Therefore, the missing number is 3n + 2 + 3 = 3n + 5, where n is an integer.
This missing number is 5
The sequence consists of perfect squares: (3^2 = 9), (4^2 = 16), (5^2 = 25), and (7^2 = 49). The missing number corresponds to (6^2), which is 36. Therefore, the missing number in the sequence is 36.
The missing number is 26. The number after 29 is 58.
The sequence appears to be made up of the squares of consecutive integers: (1^2 = 1), (4^2 = 16), and (10^2 = 100). The missing number corresponds to (7^2), which is (49). Therefore, the missing number in the sequence is 49.
The sequence consists of the squares of consecutive integers: (1^2 = 1), (4^2 = 16), (10^2 = 100), and (13^2 = 169). The missing number corresponds to (7^2), which is (49). Therefore, the missing number in the sequence is (49).
Number missing (dividend) divided by 5 (divisor)= quotient need 2 of 3 numbers to solve for missing number
2
To find the missing number in the series "9, 656143046721", we need to identify a pattern. The first number, 9, can be seen as (3^2), while the second number, 656143046721, can be expressed as (81^{2} = 9^{4}). Therefore, the missing number likely follows the pattern of powers of 9, which suggests that the missing number could be (9^{3} = 729).
62
41.
The first five prime numbers starting from 1 are 1, 2, 3, 5, 7. So 2 is the missing number.