there is no missing number of 2 for 2 is already the exact unit there is no other number with the same amount though it may be shown in many ways they all mean 2
The missing number is 5. When a number is divided by 3, the remainder is 2. So, the number can be represented as 3n + 2, where n is an integer. If we add 3 to this number, the remainder will be 1. Therefore, the missing number is 3n + 2 + 3 = 3n + 5, where n is an integer.
This missing number is 5
The missing number is 26. The number after 29 is 58.
The sequence consists of perfect squares: (3^2 = 9), (4^2 = 16), (5^2 = 25), and (7^2 = 49). The missing number corresponds to (6^2), which is 36. Therefore, the missing number in the sequence is 36.
The sequence appears to be made up of the squares of consecutive integers: (1^2 = 1), (4^2 = 16), and (10^2 = 100). The missing number corresponds to (7^2), which is (49). Therefore, the missing number in the sequence is 49.
The sequence consists of the squares of consecutive integers: (1^2 = 1), (4^2 = 16), (10^2 = 100), and (13^2 = 169). The missing number corresponds to (7^2), which is (49). Therefore, the missing number in the sequence is (49).
Number missing (dividend) divided by 5 (divisor)= quotient need 2 of 3 numbers to solve for missing number
2
To find the missing number in the series "9, 656143046721", we need to identify a pattern. The first number, 9, can be seen as (3^2), while the second number, 656143046721, can be expressed as (81^{2} = 9^{4}). Therefore, the missing number likely follows the pattern of powers of 9, which suggests that the missing number could be (9^{3} = 729).
62
41.
The first five prime numbers starting from 1 are 1, 2, 3, 5, 7. So 2 is the missing number.