30cemtimeters
42.25 cm2
The perimeter of a rectangle having 1,000 units of width and 2,000 units of length is 6,000 units
12.25 sq metres.
If a rectangle had a length of 2 and a perimeter of 2, its width would need to be negative 1. However, width, by definition is non-negative and so a width of -1 is impossible. As a result, such a rectangle cannot exist. And since it cannot exist, it cannot have an area.
Yes it measures 3 on all sides sides across from each other but it would have to be a square. Having a rectangle is impossible. Then again a square is a rectangle but a rectangle isn't a square.
The length of a rectangle is one of its two dimensions, with the other being its width. If the rectangle is specified as having a length of 12 meters, then that is the measurement you are looking for. If you meant to ask about a rectangle with a perimeter or area involving 12 meters, please clarify for a more specific answer.
t2 ÷ (2( π + 4) π = pi
1 x 20 2 x 10 4 x 5
Since the largest area would be obtained by having adjacent sides equal to each other, and since a square is at least technically an equilateral rectangle, divide the perimeter of 72 by 4 to get sides of 18 and an area of 324.
Do you mean what are the dimensions because the perimeter has already been given? If so then: length = 8.5 cm and width = 5.5 cm Check: 8.5+8.5+5.5+5.5 = 28 cm
a numerical expression as given above, cannot have a perimeter. perimeter is the outer boundary of a geometrical body. therefore the question shoud have been wots the perimeter of a body having sides 2.5mm and 7.5mm. in that case it depends upon the shape of the figure, if its a rectangle, den 2(2.5+7.5)mm = 2(1)mm= 2mm.
Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.