30cemtimeters
42.25 cm2
The perimeter of a rectangle having 1,000 units of width and 2,000 units of length is 6,000 units
12.25 sq metres.
Yes it measures 3 on all sides sides across from each other but it would have to be a square. Having a rectangle is impossible. Then again a square is a rectangle but a rectangle isn't a square.
If a rectangle had a length of 2 and a perimeter of 2, its width would need to be negative 1. However, width, by definition is non-negative and so a width of -1 is impossible. As a result, such a rectangle cannot exist. And since it cannot exist, it cannot have an area.
t2 ÷ (2( π + 4) π = pi
1 x 20 2 x 10 4 x 5
Since the largest area would be obtained by having adjacent sides equal to each other, and since a square is at least technically an equilateral rectangle, divide the perimeter of 72 by 4 to get sides of 18 and an area of 324.
Do you mean what are the dimensions because the perimeter has already been given? If so then: length = 8.5 cm and width = 5.5 cm Check: 8.5+8.5+5.5+5.5 = 28 cm
a numerical expression as given above, cannot have a perimeter. perimeter is the outer boundary of a geometrical body. therefore the question shoud have been wots the perimeter of a body having sides 2.5mm and 7.5mm. in that case it depends upon the shape of the figure, if its a rectangle, den 2(2.5+7.5)mm = 2(1)mm= 2mm.
Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.Having the perimeter does not provide enough information.
The rectangle with the smallest perimeter is a square. In this case each side of the square will be 60 m and will require 240 m of fencing. The less square the rectangle is, the larger the perimeter: Try it with a rectangle 40 x 90. This will require 260 m. Try 30 x 120: this needs 300 m...